使用伪影去除滤波器和随机森林分类器进行人工胸外按压时的心电节律分析

I. Isasi, Ali Bahrami Rad, U. Irusta, M. Zabihi, E. Aramendi, T. Eftestøl, J. Kramer-Johansen, L. Wik
{"title":"使用伪影去除滤波器和随机森林分类器进行人工胸外按压时的心电节律分析","authors":"I. Isasi, Ali Bahrami Rad, U. Irusta, M. Zabihi, E. Aramendi, T. Eftestøl, J. Kramer-Johansen, L. Wik","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2018.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decrease the chances of survival. However, CPR must be interrupted for a reliable rhythm analysis because chest compressions (CCs) induce artifacts in the ECG. This paper introduces a double-stage shock advice algorithm (SAA) for a reliable rhythm analysis during manual CCs. The method used two configurations of the recursive least-squares (RLS) filter to remove CC artifacts from the ECG. For each filtered ECG segment over 200 shock/no-shock decision features were computed and fed into a random forest (RF) classifier to select the most discriminative 25 features. The proposed SAA is an ensemble of two RF classifiers which were trained using the 25 features derived from different filter configurations. Then, the average value of class posterior probabilities was used to make a final shock/no-shock decision. The dataset was comprised of 506 shockable and 1697 non-shockable rhythms which were labelled by expert rhythm resuscitation reviewers in artifact-free intervals. Shock/no-shock diagnoses obtained through the proposed double-stage SAA were compared with the rhythm annotations to obtain the Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp) and balanced accuracy (BAC) of the method. The results were 93.5%, 96.5% and 95.0%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":215521,"journal":{"name":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECG Rhythm Analysis During Manual Chest Compressions Using an Artefact Removal Filter and Random Forest Classifiers\",\"authors\":\"I. Isasi, Ali Bahrami Rad, U. Irusta, M. Zabihi, E. Aramendi, T. Eftestøl, J. Kramer-Johansen, L. Wik\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2018.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decrease the chances of survival. However, CPR must be interrupted for a reliable rhythm analysis because chest compressions (CCs) induce artifacts in the ECG. This paper introduces a double-stage shock advice algorithm (SAA) for a reliable rhythm analysis during manual CCs. The method used two configurations of the recursive least-squares (RLS) filter to remove CC artifacts from the ECG. For each filtered ECG segment over 200 shock/no-shock decision features were computed and fed into a random forest (RF) classifier to select the most discriminative 25 features. The proposed SAA is an ensemble of two RF classifiers which were trained using the 25 features derived from different filter configurations. Then, the average value of class posterior probabilities was used to make a final shock/no-shock decision. The dataset was comprised of 506 shockable and 1697 non-shockable rhythms which were labelled by expert rhythm resuscitation reviewers in artifact-free intervals. Shock/no-shock diagnoses obtained through the proposed double-stage SAA were compared with the rhythm annotations to obtain the Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp) and balanced accuracy (BAC) of the method. The results were 93.5%, 96.5% and 95.0%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

心肺复苏术(CPR)的中断会降低存活的机会。然而,为了进行可靠的心律分析,心肺复苏术必须中断,因为胸部按压(CCs)会在心电图中引起伪影。本文介绍了一种双级冲击建议算法(SAA),用于人工CCs过程中可靠的节律分析。该方法采用递归最小二乘(RLS)滤波器的两种配置来去除心电信号中的CC伪影。对于每个滤波后的心电段,计算超过200个冲击/无冲击决策特征,并将其输入随机森林(RF)分类器中,以选择最具判别性的25个特征。所提出的SAA是两个射频分类器的集合,这两个分类器使用来自不同滤波器配置的25个特征进行训练。然后,使用类后验概率的平均值来做出最终的冲击/不冲击决策。该数据集由506个震荡节律和1697个非震荡节律组成,由节律复苏专家在无伪影间隔内标记。通过提出的双阶段SAA获得的休克/非休克诊断与节律注释进行比较,以获得该方法的灵敏度(Se),特异性(Sp)和平衡精度(BAC)。结果分别为93.5%、96.5%和95.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECG Rhythm Analysis During Manual Chest Compressions Using an Artefact Removal Filter and Random Forest Classifiers
Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decrease the chances of survival. However, CPR must be interrupted for a reliable rhythm analysis because chest compressions (CCs) induce artifacts in the ECG. This paper introduces a double-stage shock advice algorithm (SAA) for a reliable rhythm analysis during manual CCs. The method used two configurations of the recursive least-squares (RLS) filter to remove CC artifacts from the ECG. For each filtered ECG segment over 200 shock/no-shock decision features were computed and fed into a random forest (RF) classifier to select the most discriminative 25 features. The proposed SAA is an ensemble of two RF classifiers which were trained using the 25 features derived from different filter configurations. Then, the average value of class posterior probabilities was used to make a final shock/no-shock decision. The dataset was comprised of 506 shockable and 1697 non-shockable rhythms which were labelled by expert rhythm resuscitation reviewers in artifact-free intervals. Shock/no-shock diagnoses obtained through the proposed double-stage SAA were compared with the rhythm annotations to obtain the Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp) and balanced accuracy (BAC) of the method. The results were 93.5%, 96.5% and 95.0%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信