{"title":"一个评价面向对象软件可维护性的对照实验","authors":"S. Henry, M. Humphrey","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.1990.131370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe an experiment which compares the maintainability of two functionally equivalent systems in order to explore the claim that systems developed with object-oriented languages are more easily maintained than those programmed with procedural languages. Supporting evidence was found that programmers produce more maintainable code with an object-oriented language than with a standard procedural language.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":107276,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1990","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A controlled experiment to evaluate maintainability of object-oriented software\",\"authors\":\"S. Henry, M. Humphrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.1990.131370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors describe an experiment which compares the maintainability of two functionally equivalent systems in order to explore the claim that systems developed with object-oriented languages are more easily maintained than those programmed with procedural languages. Supporting evidence was found that programmers produce more maintainable code with an object-oriented language than with a standard procedural language.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":107276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1990\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1990\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1990.131370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1990","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1990.131370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A controlled experiment to evaluate maintainability of object-oriented software
The authors describe an experiment which compares the maintainability of two functionally equivalent systems in order to explore the claim that systems developed with object-oriented languages are more easily maintained than those programmed with procedural languages. Supporting evidence was found that programmers produce more maintainable code with an object-oriented language than with a standard procedural language.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
