物联网(IoT)基于udp的可靠传输协议评估

Madzirin Masirap, Mohd Harith Amaran, Y. M. Yussoff, R. Ab Rahman, H. Hashim
{"title":"物联网(IoT)基于udp的可靠传输协议评估","authors":"Madzirin Masirap, Mohd Harith Amaran, Y. M. Yussoff, R. Ab Rahman, H. Hashim","doi":"10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For IoT applications that require near real-time wireless connections, the traditional TCP protocol is not adept enough due to the size of its packet header, its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and its slow start strategy. This paper mainly evaluates three kinds of reliable UDP-based transport protocols namely, RUBDP, UDT, and PA-UDP, for use in IoT applications. The evaluation was done on a test bed that consists of two machines connected by wireless ad-hoc network. We consider the effect of data size by monitoring throughput of the implemented protocol. This paper also discusses the CPU usage on the sender and receiver side of each protocol. The paper findings are, PA-UDP protocol has the best throughput performance but requires high CPU utilization during the start and end of transmission at the receiver side. Meanwhile, UDT protocol is most efficient in term of CPU usage although it provides lesser throughput. RBUDP, on the other hand, performed consistently in wireless network but CPU usage is very high at the sender side. The conclusion drawn on this paper is UDT protocol is the most suitable protocol of the three for IoT applications because it has consistent performance and is CPU friendly.","PeriodicalId":412517,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of reliable UDP-based transport protocols for Internet of Things (IoT)\",\"authors\":\"Madzirin Masirap, Mohd Harith Amaran, Y. M. Yussoff, R. Ab Rahman, H. Hashim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For IoT applications that require near real-time wireless connections, the traditional TCP protocol is not adept enough due to the size of its packet header, its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and its slow start strategy. This paper mainly evaluates three kinds of reliable UDP-based transport protocols namely, RUBDP, UDT, and PA-UDP, for use in IoT applications. The evaluation was done on a test bed that consists of two machines connected by wireless ad-hoc network. We consider the effect of data size by monitoring throughput of the implemented protocol. This paper also discusses the CPU usage on the sender and receiver side of each protocol. The paper findings are, PA-UDP protocol has the best throughput performance but requires high CPU utilization during the start and end of transmission at the receiver side. Meanwhile, UDT protocol is most efficient in term of CPU usage although it provides lesser throughput. RBUDP, on the other hand, performed consistently in wireless network but CPU usage is very high at the sender side. The conclusion drawn on this paper is UDT protocol is the most suitable protocol of the three for IoT applications because it has consistent performance and is CPU friendly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2016.7575063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

对于需要近实时无线连接的物联网应用,传统的TCP协议由于其数据包头的大小,保守的AIMD拥塞控制算法和缓慢的启动策略而不够熟练。本文主要评估了三种可靠的基于udp的传输协议,即RUBDP, UDT和PA-UDP,用于物联网应用。评估是在一个试验台上完成的,该试验台由两台通过无线自组织网络连接的机器组成。我们通过监控所实现协议的吞吐量来考虑数据大小的影响。本文还讨论了每个协议的发送端和接收端的CPU使用情况。本文的研究结果是,PA-UDP协议具有最佳的吞吐量性能,但在接收端传输的开始和结束期间需要较高的CPU利用率。同时,UDT协议在CPU使用方面是最有效的,尽管它提供的吞吐量较小。另一方面,RBUDP在无线网络中表现一致,但发送端CPU使用率非常高。本文得出的结论是UDT协议是三种协议中最适合物联网应用的协议,因为它具有一致的性能并且对CPU友好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of reliable UDP-based transport protocols for Internet of Things (IoT)
For IoT applications that require near real-time wireless connections, the traditional TCP protocol is not adept enough due to the size of its packet header, its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and its slow start strategy. This paper mainly evaluates three kinds of reliable UDP-based transport protocols namely, RUBDP, UDT, and PA-UDP, for use in IoT applications. The evaluation was done on a test bed that consists of two machines connected by wireless ad-hoc network. We consider the effect of data size by monitoring throughput of the implemented protocol. This paper also discusses the CPU usage on the sender and receiver side of each protocol. The paper findings are, PA-UDP protocol has the best throughput performance but requires high CPU utilization during the start and end of transmission at the receiver side. Meanwhile, UDT protocol is most efficient in term of CPU usage although it provides lesser throughput. RBUDP, on the other hand, performed consistently in wireless network but CPU usage is very high at the sender side. The conclusion drawn on this paper is UDT protocol is the most suitable protocol of the three for IoT applications because it has consistent performance and is CPU friendly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信