开关磁阻电动机(SRM)的PI和PI反转速控制

Diky Zakaria, H. Hindersah, A. Syaichu-Rohman, A. Abdullah
{"title":"开关磁阻电动机(SRM)的PI和PI反转速控制","authors":"Diky Zakaria, H. Hindersah, A. Syaichu-Rohman, A. Abdullah","doi":"10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SRM is nonlinear system. This study discusses the SRM speed control as the main driving force for electric vehicles using linear approach. The SRM used in this paper has a narrow input saturation range. SRM only rotates at the PWM value of 72-84 or the equivalent input voltage to the SRM driver of 1.446 volts - 1.753 volts. At the PWM value of 0-71 and PWM 85-255, the SRM does not rotate (dead zone). This study discusses the design of SRM speed control with PI and PI Antiwindup (PI AW) methods in that narrow input saturation range. The design is done by modelling the system in the SysId MATLAB by looking at the SRM response when PWM input is given. A first-order dynamic model is obtained from the identification results with the SysId MATLAB. The controller design is carried out analytically. At the implementation stage, the control signal used is only a positive control signal that makes the motor rotate without any braking effect. The results of the implementation of PI and PI AW are compared to see the performance of the two controllers. From the simulation and implementation, data is obtained that the designed control system can control the SRM speed in reaching the steady state value, the overshoot value and the steady state error leading to 0%. PI AW controller has better performance than PI controllers in terms of settling time and overshoot percentage. The PI controller has a slight advantage at steady state error over the PI AW controller.","PeriodicalId":161240,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PI and PI Antiwindup Speed Control of Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM)\",\"authors\":\"Diky Zakaria, H. Hindersah, A. Syaichu-Rohman, A. Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SRM is nonlinear system. This study discusses the SRM speed control as the main driving force for electric vehicles using linear approach. The SRM used in this paper has a narrow input saturation range. SRM only rotates at the PWM value of 72-84 or the equivalent input voltage to the SRM driver of 1.446 volts - 1.753 volts. At the PWM value of 0-71 and PWM 85-255, the SRM does not rotate (dead zone). This study discusses the design of SRM speed control with PI and PI Antiwindup (PI AW) methods in that narrow input saturation range. The design is done by modelling the system in the SysId MATLAB by looking at the SRM response when PWM input is given. A first-order dynamic model is obtained from the identification results with the SysId MATLAB. The controller design is carried out analytically. At the implementation stage, the control signal used is only a positive control signal that makes the motor rotate without any braking effect. The results of the implementation of PI and PI AW are compared to see the performance of the two controllers. From the simulation and implementation, data is obtained that the designed control system can control the SRM speed in reaching the steady state value, the overshoot value and the steady state error leading to 0%. PI AW controller has better performance than PI controllers in terms of settling time and overshoot percentage. The PI controller has a slight advantage at steady state error over the PI AW controller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)\",\"volume\":\"194 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA52817.2021.9502255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

SRM是一个非线性系统。本文采用线性方法讨论了作为电动汽车主要驱动力的SRM速度控制问题。本文所采用的SRM具有较窄的输入饱和范围。SRM仅在PWM值72-84或SRM驱动器的等效输入电压1.446伏- 1.753伏时旋转。在PWM值0-71和PWM 85-255时,SRM不旋转(死区)。本文讨论了在较窄的输入饱和范围内采用PI和PI Antiwindup (PI AW)方法进行SRM速度控制的设计。设计是通过在SysId MATLAB中对系统进行建模,通过观察给定PWM输入时的SRM响应来完成的。利用SysId MATLAB对辨识结果建立了一阶动力学模型。对控制器进行了解析式设计。在实施阶段,使用的控制信号仅为使电机旋转的正控制信号,没有任何制动效果。将PI和PI AW的实现结果进行比较,以了解两种控制器的性能。仿真和实现结果表明,所设计的控制系统能够控制SRM转速达到稳态值、超调值和稳态误差达到0%。PI AW控制器在稳定时间和超调率方面优于PI控制器。在稳态误差方面,PI控制器比PI AW控制器有轻微的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PI and PI Antiwindup Speed Control of Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM)
SRM is nonlinear system. This study discusses the SRM speed control as the main driving force for electric vehicles using linear approach. The SRM used in this paper has a narrow input saturation range. SRM only rotates at the PWM value of 72-84 or the equivalent input voltage to the SRM driver of 1.446 volts - 1.753 volts. At the PWM value of 0-71 and PWM 85-255, the SRM does not rotate (dead zone). This study discusses the design of SRM speed control with PI and PI Antiwindup (PI AW) methods in that narrow input saturation range. The design is done by modelling the system in the SysId MATLAB by looking at the SRM response when PWM input is given. A first-order dynamic model is obtained from the identification results with the SysId MATLAB. The controller design is carried out analytically. At the implementation stage, the control signal used is only a positive control signal that makes the motor rotate without any braking effect. The results of the implementation of PI and PI AW are compared to see the performance of the two controllers. From the simulation and implementation, data is obtained that the designed control system can control the SRM speed in reaching the steady state value, the overshoot value and the steady state error leading to 0%. PI AW controller has better performance than PI controllers in terms of settling time and overshoot percentage. The PI controller has a slight advantage at steady state error over the PI AW controller.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信