揭露危险:州检察官道德规则应对气候变化

V. Flatt
{"title":"揭露危险:州检察官道德规则应对气候变化","authors":"V. Flatt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3340130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article suggests a novel concept in climate change law and attorney ethics law by proposing that many states’ attorney ethics laws could be interpreted to require, or at least permit, attorneys to disclose client activity relating to greenhouse gas emissions. Every state has some form of ABA Model Rule 1.6(b), either requiring or allowing attorneys to disclose client activities that result in death or substantial bodily harm. This article asserts that prior precedent surrounding this disclosure rule indicates that it could be applicable to greenhouse gas emissions. Attorney disclosures in turn, could impact a wide swath of greenhouse gas emission activity, making it more transparent, and in certain cases requiring attorneys to counsel cessation of such activities or withdraw from representation. Because there is growing climate activism seeking to use all legal tools to slow or stop greenhouse gas emissions, this attorney ethics issue could be a strategic tool to try and control greenhouse gas emissions activities. Thus attorneys from the private sector to government should be aware of the potential ethical issues they face in handling greenhouse gas related legal work.","PeriodicalId":318823,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility eJournal","volume":"402 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disclosing the Danger: State Attorney Ethics Rules Meet Climate Change\",\"authors\":\"V. Flatt\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3340130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article suggests a novel concept in climate change law and attorney ethics law by proposing that many states’ attorney ethics laws could be interpreted to require, or at least permit, attorneys to disclose client activity relating to greenhouse gas emissions. Every state has some form of ABA Model Rule 1.6(b), either requiring or allowing attorneys to disclose client activities that result in death or substantial bodily harm. This article asserts that prior precedent surrounding this disclosure rule indicates that it could be applicable to greenhouse gas emissions. Attorney disclosures in turn, could impact a wide swath of greenhouse gas emission activity, making it more transparent, and in certain cases requiring attorneys to counsel cessation of such activities or withdraw from representation. Because there is growing climate activism seeking to use all legal tools to slow or stop greenhouse gas emissions, this attorney ethics issue could be a strategic tool to try and control greenhouse gas emissions activities. Thus attorneys from the private sector to government should be aware of the potential ethical issues they face in handling greenhouse gas related legal work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility eJournal\",\"volume\":\"402 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3340130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3340130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了气候变化法和律师道德法中的一个新概念,提出许多州的律师道德法可以解释为要求或至少允许律师披露与温室气体排放有关的客户活动。每个州都有某种形式的美国律师协会示范规则1.6(b),要求或允许律师披露导致客户死亡或实质性身体伤害的活动。本文断言,围绕这一披露规则的先前先例表明,它可以适用于温室气体排放。律师的信息披露反过来可能会影响大量温室气体排放活动,使其更加透明,并在某些情况下要求律师建议停止此类活动或退出代理。因为越来越多的气候行动主义寻求使用所有法律工具来减缓或阻止温室气体排放,这个律师道德问题可能是一个战略工具,试图控制温室气体排放活动。因此,从私营部门到政府的律师都应该意识到他们在处理与温室气体有关的法律工作时面临的潜在道德问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disclosing the Danger: State Attorney Ethics Rules Meet Climate Change
This article suggests a novel concept in climate change law and attorney ethics law by proposing that many states’ attorney ethics laws could be interpreted to require, or at least permit, attorneys to disclose client activity relating to greenhouse gas emissions. Every state has some form of ABA Model Rule 1.6(b), either requiring or allowing attorneys to disclose client activities that result in death or substantial bodily harm. This article asserts that prior precedent surrounding this disclosure rule indicates that it could be applicable to greenhouse gas emissions. Attorney disclosures in turn, could impact a wide swath of greenhouse gas emission activity, making it more transparent, and in certain cases requiring attorneys to counsel cessation of such activities or withdraw from representation. Because there is growing climate activism seeking to use all legal tools to slow or stop greenhouse gas emissions, this attorney ethics issue could be a strategic tool to try and control greenhouse gas emissions activities. Thus attorneys from the private sector to government should be aware of the potential ethical issues they face in handling greenhouse gas related legal work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信