前向不变切割简化安全性证明

N. Aréchiga, J. Kapinski, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, André Platzer, B. Krogh
{"title":"前向不变切割简化安全性证明","authors":"N. Aréchiga, J. Kapinski, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, André Platzer, B. Krogh","doi":"10.1109/EMSOFT.2015.7318278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of deductive techniques, such as theorem provers, has several advantages in safety verification of hybrid systems; however, state-of-the-art theorem provers require manual intervention to handle complex systems. Furthermore, there is often a gap between the type of assistance that a theorem prover requires to make progress on a proof task and the assistance that a system designer is able to provide directly. This paper presents an extension to KeYmaera, a deductive verification tool for differential dynamic logic; the new technique allows local reasoning using system designer intuition about performance within particular modes as part of a proof task. Our approach allows the theorem prover to leverage forward invariants, discovered using numerical techniques, as part of a proof of safety. We introduce a new inference rule into the proof calculus of KeYmaera, the forward invariant cut rule, and we present a methodology to discover useful forward invariants, which are then used with the new cut rule to complete verification tasks. We demonstrate how our new approach can be used to complete verification tasks that lie out of the reach of existing automatic verification approaches using several examples, including one involving an automotive powertrain control system.","PeriodicalId":297297,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forward invariant cuts to simplify proofs of safety\",\"authors\":\"N. Aréchiga, J. Kapinski, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, André Platzer, B. Krogh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMSOFT.2015.7318278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of deductive techniques, such as theorem provers, has several advantages in safety verification of hybrid systems; however, state-of-the-art theorem provers require manual intervention to handle complex systems. Furthermore, there is often a gap between the type of assistance that a theorem prover requires to make progress on a proof task and the assistance that a system designer is able to provide directly. This paper presents an extension to KeYmaera, a deductive verification tool for differential dynamic logic; the new technique allows local reasoning using system designer intuition about performance within particular modes as part of a proof task. Our approach allows the theorem prover to leverage forward invariants, discovered using numerical techniques, as part of a proof of safety. We introduce a new inference rule into the proof calculus of KeYmaera, the forward invariant cut rule, and we present a methodology to discover useful forward invariants, which are then used with the new cut rule to complete verification tasks. We demonstrate how our new approach can be used to complete verification tasks that lie out of the reach of existing automatic verification approaches using several examples, including one involving an automotive powertrain control system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMSOFT.2015.7318278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMSOFT.2015.7318278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

使用演绎技术,如定理证明,在混合系统的安全验证中有几个优点;然而,最先进的定理证明者需要人工干预来处理复杂的系统。此外,定理证明者在证明任务中取得进展所需的帮助类型与系统设计师能够直接提供的帮助类型之间通常存在差距。本文对差分动态逻辑的演绎验证工具KeYmaera进行了扩展;新技术允许使用系统设计者对特定模式下性能的直觉进行局部推理,作为证明任务的一部分。我们的方法允许定理证明者利用前向不变量,使用数值技术发现,作为安全性证明的一部分。我们在KeYmaera的证明演算中引入了一个新的推理规则——前向不变切割规则,并提出了一种发现有用的前向不变量的方法,然后将这些前向不变量与新的切割规则一起使用来完成验证任务。我们通过几个例子,包括一个涉及汽车动力总成控制系统的例子,展示了我们的新方法如何用于完成现有自动验证方法无法完成的验证任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forward invariant cuts to simplify proofs of safety
The use of deductive techniques, such as theorem provers, has several advantages in safety verification of hybrid systems; however, state-of-the-art theorem provers require manual intervention to handle complex systems. Furthermore, there is often a gap between the type of assistance that a theorem prover requires to make progress on a proof task and the assistance that a system designer is able to provide directly. This paper presents an extension to KeYmaera, a deductive verification tool for differential dynamic logic; the new technique allows local reasoning using system designer intuition about performance within particular modes as part of a proof task. Our approach allows the theorem prover to leverage forward invariants, discovered using numerical techniques, as part of a proof of safety. We introduce a new inference rule into the proof calculus of KeYmaera, the forward invariant cut rule, and we present a methodology to discover useful forward invariants, which are then used with the new cut rule to complete verification tasks. We demonstrate how our new approach can be used to complete verification tasks that lie out of the reach of existing automatic verification approaches using several examples, including one involving an automotive powertrain control system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信