情报分析工具选择的方法论

H. Vafaie, Nichols F. Brown, Lap Truong
{"title":"情报分析工具选择的方法论","authors":"H. Vafaie, Nichols F. Brown, Lap Truong","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2006.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) / government-off-the-shelf (GOTS) applications as components in software systems is increasingly prevalent. The critical step of tool selection for an integrated suite is usually based on identifying the tools that best match the functionality requirements needed. Other factors tangential to technical performance are playing a more important role in the tool selection process and making the mapping of customer needs to technical requirements less obvious. This paper suggests a shift from the traditional \"best tools\" selection approach, where tools are selected for their performance to a more holistic \"end-to-end\" approach, where customer concerns, business and cost benefits, and technical performance are weighed concurrently. The end-to-end methodology was applied to an integrated suite for the intelligence analysis process and was compared to a theoretical system employing a best tools approach. This showed that the end-to-end approach resulted in significant software related cost reductions","PeriodicalId":169424,"journal":{"name":"2006 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'06)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology for the Selection of Intelligence Analysis Tools\",\"authors\":\"H. Vafaie, Nichols F. Brown, Lap Truong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2006.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) / government-off-the-shelf (GOTS) applications as components in software systems is increasingly prevalent. The critical step of tool selection for an integrated suite is usually based on identifying the tools that best match the functionality requirements needed. Other factors tangential to technical performance are playing a more important role in the tool selection process and making the mapping of customer needs to technical requirements less obvious. This paper suggests a shift from the traditional \\\"best tools\\\" selection approach, where tools are selected for their performance to a more holistic \\\"end-to-end\\\" approach, where customer concerns, business and cost benefits, and technical performance are weighed concurrently. The end-to-end methodology was applied to an integrated suite for the intelligence analysis process and was compared to a theoretical system employing a best tools approach. This showed that the end-to-end approach resulted in significant software related cost reductions\",\"PeriodicalId\":169424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'06)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2006.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2006.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

商用现货(COTS) /政府现货(GOTS)应用程序作为软件系统组件的使用越来越普遍。为集成套件选择工具的关键步骤通常是基于识别与所需功能需求最匹配的工具。与技术性能无关的其他因素在工具选择过程中扮演着更重要的角色,并且使得客户需求到技术需求的映射不那么明显。本文建议从传统的“最佳工具”选择方法(根据工具的性能选择工具)转向更全面的“端到端”方法(同时权衡客户关注、业务和成本收益以及技术性能)。端到端方法应用于智能分析过程的集成套件,并与采用最佳工具方法的理论系统进行比较。这表明端到端方法显著降低了软件相关的成本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodology for the Selection of Intelligence Analysis Tools
The use of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) / government-off-the-shelf (GOTS) applications as components in software systems is increasingly prevalent. The critical step of tool selection for an integrated suite is usually based on identifying the tools that best match the functionality requirements needed. Other factors tangential to technical performance are playing a more important role in the tool selection process and making the mapping of customer needs to technical requirements less obvious. This paper suggests a shift from the traditional "best tools" selection approach, where tools are selected for their performance to a more holistic "end-to-end" approach, where customer concerns, business and cost benefits, and technical performance are weighed concurrently. The end-to-end methodology was applied to an integrated suite for the intelligence analysis process and was compared to a theoretical system employing a best tools approach. This showed that the end-to-end approach resulted in significant software related cost reductions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信