Jung Yee Kim, M. Son, You Kyung Kim, Meounggon Lee, Jin-Heem Kim, C. Youm
{"title":"冻结步态和视觉信息对帕金森病患者静态姿势控制能力的影响","authors":"Jung Yee Kim, M. Son, You Kyung Kim, Meounggon Lee, Jin-Heem Kim, C. Youm","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of freezing of gait and visual information on the static postural control ability in patients with Parkinson ' s Disease (PD) during the bipedal stance with feet together. Method: This study included a total of 36 patients with PD; the freezer group included 17 PD patients (age: 69.3 ± 6.2 yrs, height: 159.6 ± 9.0 cm, weight: 63.4 ± 9.78 kg) and the nonfreezer group included 19 PD patients (age: 71.4 ± 5.6 yrs, height: 155.8 ± 7.1 cm, weight: 57.7 ± 8.6 kg). Static postural control ability was analyzed using variables of center of pressure (COP) and dividing by mediolateral, anteroposterior, and integration factors during a bipedal stance with the eyes open and closed. Results: Freezers and nonfreezers showed increases in anteroposterior velocity, mediolateral velocity, averaged velocity, and mediolateral 95% edge frequency when visual information was blocked. Additionally, freezers had greater anteroposterior range, 95% confidence ellipse area, and COP anteroposterior mean position than nonfreezers. Conclusion: Freezers and nonfreezers showed a reduction in static postural control ability when visual information was blocked. Additionally, the results of this study found a significant difference in static postural control ability between freezers and nonfreezers with PD. In particular, anteroposterior range, 95% confidence ellipse area, and COP anteroposterior mean position might be used to distinguish between freezers and nonfreezers with PD.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Freezing of Gait and Visual Information on the Static Postural Control Ability in Patients with Parkinson`s Disease\",\"authors\":\"Jung Yee Kim, M. Son, You Kyung Kim, Meounggon Lee, Jin-Heem Kim, C. Youm\",\"doi\":\"10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of freezing of gait and visual information on the static postural control ability in patients with Parkinson ' s Disease (PD) during the bipedal stance with feet together. Method: This study included a total of 36 patients with PD; the freezer group included 17 PD patients (age: 69.3 ± 6.2 yrs, height: 159.6 ± 9.0 cm, weight: 63.4 ± 9.78 kg) and the nonfreezer group included 19 PD patients (age: 71.4 ± 5.6 yrs, height: 155.8 ± 7.1 cm, weight: 57.7 ± 8.6 kg). Static postural control ability was analyzed using variables of center of pressure (COP) and dividing by mediolateral, anteroposterior, and integration factors during a bipedal stance with the eyes open and closed. Results: Freezers and nonfreezers showed increases in anteroposterior velocity, mediolateral velocity, averaged velocity, and mediolateral 95% edge frequency when visual information was blocked. Additionally, freezers had greater anteroposterior range, 95% confidence ellipse area, and COP anteroposterior mean position than nonfreezers. Conclusion: Freezers and nonfreezers showed a reduction in static postural control ability when visual information was blocked. Additionally, the results of this study found a significant difference in static postural control ability between freezers and nonfreezers with PD. In particular, anteroposterior range, 95% confidence ellipse area, and COP anteroposterior mean position might be used to distinguish between freezers and nonfreezers with PD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.3.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Freezing of Gait and Visual Information on the Static Postural Control Ability in Patients with Parkinson`s Disease
Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of freezing of gait and visual information on the static postural control ability in patients with Parkinson ' s Disease (PD) during the bipedal stance with feet together. Method: This study included a total of 36 patients with PD; the freezer group included 17 PD patients (age: 69.3 ± 6.2 yrs, height: 159.6 ± 9.0 cm, weight: 63.4 ± 9.78 kg) and the nonfreezer group included 19 PD patients (age: 71.4 ± 5.6 yrs, height: 155.8 ± 7.1 cm, weight: 57.7 ± 8.6 kg). Static postural control ability was analyzed using variables of center of pressure (COP) and dividing by mediolateral, anteroposterior, and integration factors during a bipedal stance with the eyes open and closed. Results: Freezers and nonfreezers showed increases in anteroposterior velocity, mediolateral velocity, averaged velocity, and mediolateral 95% edge frequency when visual information was blocked. Additionally, freezers had greater anteroposterior range, 95% confidence ellipse area, and COP anteroposterior mean position than nonfreezers. Conclusion: Freezers and nonfreezers showed a reduction in static postural control ability when visual information was blocked. Additionally, the results of this study found a significant difference in static postural control ability between freezers and nonfreezers with PD. In particular, anteroposterior range, 95% confidence ellipse area, and COP anteroposterior mean position might be used to distinguish between freezers and nonfreezers with PD.