基于腹腔镜肾固定术禁忌症的肾下垂手术策略的确定

I. G. Leshchenko, V.B. Polutin
{"title":"基于腹腔镜肾固定术禁忌症的肾下垂手术策略的确定","authors":"I. G. Leshchenko, V.B. Polutin","doi":"10.31549/2541-8289-2023-7-1-4-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The study of the literature indicates that the list of indications for laparoscopic nephropexy (LNP) in patients with nephroptosis meets the requirements of urological practice, but contraindications to this operation do not correspond. Aim of the research. Based on the modern approach to determining contraindications for LNP, to develop a rational treatment strategy for performing this operation in patients with nephroptosis, aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of complications. Materials and methods. The study included the results of examination and treatment of 208 patients with stage 2–3 nephroptosis. In 1987–2001 103 patients (control group) underwent nephropexy according to the Pytel-Lopatkin method, taking into account the contraindications to nephropexy existing at that time. In 2002–2012 62 patients (main group A) underwent LNP using a polypropylene mesh according to our patented method. At the same time, LNP was contraindicated in 43 outpatients (main group B), taking into account the author's list of contraindications. Results. The use of the author's list of contraindications made it possible to establish among the patients of the main group B absolute contraindications to LNP in 9.3%, relative – in 37.2%, temporary – in 44.2%, special contraindication to LNP – in 4 (9.3%), which contributed to the prevention of possible postoperative complications among them, and among patients of the main group A, compared with the control group, there was a statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications. Conclusion. Therapeutic tactics based on the author's list of contraindications is that the patients with absolute contraindications to LNP are recommended conservative treatment; with relative contraindications – when transferring the concomitant diseases from subcompensation to compensation and with temporary contraindications – in the treatment of these diseases, LNP is performed. And in patients with special contraindication to LNP (abdominal adhesive disease), open nephropexy is performed. A new list of contraindications to LNP in patients with nephroptosis can be recommended for wider implementation in urological practice, which may contribute to improving the quality of treatment of these patients.","PeriodicalId":342613,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskij medicinskij vestnik","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETERMINATION OF SURGICAL TACTICS IN PATIENTS WITH NEPHROPTOSIS BASING ON CONTRAINDICATIONS TO LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHROPEXY\",\"authors\":\"I. G. Leshchenko, V.B. Polutin\",\"doi\":\"10.31549/2541-8289-2023-7-1-4-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The study of the literature indicates that the list of indications for laparoscopic nephropexy (LNP) in patients with nephroptosis meets the requirements of urological practice, but contraindications to this operation do not correspond. Aim of the research. Based on the modern approach to determining contraindications for LNP, to develop a rational treatment strategy for performing this operation in patients with nephroptosis, aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of complications. Materials and methods. The study included the results of examination and treatment of 208 patients with stage 2–3 nephroptosis. In 1987–2001 103 patients (control group) underwent nephropexy according to the Pytel-Lopatkin method, taking into account the contraindications to nephropexy existing at that time. In 2002–2012 62 patients (main group A) underwent LNP using a polypropylene mesh according to our patented method. At the same time, LNP was contraindicated in 43 outpatients (main group B), taking into account the author's list of contraindications. Results. The use of the author's list of contraindications made it possible to establish among the patients of the main group B absolute contraindications to LNP in 9.3%, relative – in 37.2%, temporary – in 44.2%, special contraindication to LNP – in 4 (9.3%), which contributed to the prevention of possible postoperative complications among them, and among patients of the main group A, compared with the control group, there was a statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications. Conclusion. Therapeutic tactics based on the author's list of contraindications is that the patients with absolute contraindications to LNP are recommended conservative treatment; with relative contraindications – when transferring the concomitant diseases from subcompensation to compensation and with temporary contraindications – in the treatment of these diseases, LNP is performed. And in patients with special contraindication to LNP (abdominal adhesive disease), open nephropexy is performed. A new list of contraindications to LNP in patients with nephroptosis can be recommended for wider implementation in urological practice, which may contribute to improving the quality of treatment of these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sibirskij medicinskij vestnik\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sibirskij medicinskij vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31549/2541-8289-2023-7-1-4-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskij medicinskij vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31549/2541-8289-2023-7-1-4-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。文献研究表明,肾下垂患者腹腔镜肾固定术(LNP)的适应症清单符合泌尿外科实践的要求,但该手术的禁忌症不符合。研究的目的。根据现代方法确定LNP的禁忌症,制定合理的治疗策略,对肾下垂患者进行该手术,旨在减少并发症的发生频率和严重程度。材料和方法。该研究包括208例2-3期肾下垂患者的检查和治疗结果。1987-2001年,考虑到当时存在的肾固定术禁忌症,采用Pytel-Lopatkin法行肾固定术103例(对照组)。2002-2012年,62例患者(主要为A组)根据我们的专利方法使用聚丙烯网片进行LNP。同时,结合作者的禁忌症清单,对43例门诊患者(主要为B组)进行LNP禁忌症分析。结果。作者的禁忌症列表的使用成为可能建立在病人的主要在9.3%,B组绝对禁忌症现况相对——37.2%,临时——44.2%,特殊禁忌LNP - 4(9.3%),这可能有助于预防术后并发症,主要组的患者中,与对照组相比,有显著减少术后并发症。结论。根据作者列出的禁忌症,建议对LNP有绝对禁忌症的患者进行保守治疗;在这些疾病的治疗中,有相对禁忌症——当伴随疾病从亚代偿性转移到代偿性和有临时禁忌症时,实施LNP。对于有特殊禁忌症的LNP(腹腔粘连病)患者,行开放性肾固定术。一份新的肾下垂患者LNP禁忌症清单可以推荐在泌尿外科实践中更广泛地实施,这可能有助于提高这些患者的治疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DETERMINATION OF SURGICAL TACTICS IN PATIENTS WITH NEPHROPTOSIS BASING ON CONTRAINDICATIONS TO LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHROPEXY
Introduction. The study of the literature indicates that the list of indications for laparoscopic nephropexy (LNP) in patients with nephroptosis meets the requirements of urological practice, but contraindications to this operation do not correspond. Aim of the research. Based on the modern approach to determining contraindications for LNP, to develop a rational treatment strategy for performing this operation in patients with nephroptosis, aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of complications. Materials and methods. The study included the results of examination and treatment of 208 patients with stage 2–3 nephroptosis. In 1987–2001 103 patients (control group) underwent nephropexy according to the Pytel-Lopatkin method, taking into account the contraindications to nephropexy existing at that time. In 2002–2012 62 patients (main group A) underwent LNP using a polypropylene mesh according to our patented method. At the same time, LNP was contraindicated in 43 outpatients (main group B), taking into account the author's list of contraindications. Results. The use of the author's list of contraindications made it possible to establish among the patients of the main group B absolute contraindications to LNP in 9.3%, relative – in 37.2%, temporary – in 44.2%, special contraindication to LNP – in 4 (9.3%), which contributed to the prevention of possible postoperative complications among them, and among patients of the main group A, compared with the control group, there was a statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications. Conclusion. Therapeutic tactics based on the author's list of contraindications is that the patients with absolute contraindications to LNP are recommended conservative treatment; with relative contraindications – when transferring the concomitant diseases from subcompensation to compensation and with temporary contraindications – in the treatment of these diseases, LNP is performed. And in patients with special contraindication to LNP (abdominal adhesive disease), open nephropexy is performed. A new list of contraindications to LNP in patients with nephroptosis can be recommended for wider implementation in urological practice, which may contribute to improving the quality of treatment of these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信