{"title":"比你看到的更多","authors":"M. Roberts","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823294350.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay takes up the maṇḍala, as it appears in the non-dual Śaiva traditions of Kashmir, as a helpful point of comparison with the cross. It centers on two instances in which contemplating a shocking image becomes a theologically illuminating practice: Julian of Norwich’s contemplation on her vision of the crucifixion scene, and tantric meditations on Śiva in the terrible form of Bhairava. Reading these practices together yields an interpretation of the cross that disrupts the logical calculus of substitutionary atonement through sensory and imaginative encounters with an “at-one-ment” of divinization and solidarity.","PeriodicalId":195231,"journal":{"name":"Atonement and Comparative Theology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Than Meets the Eye\",\"authors\":\"M. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823294350.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay takes up the maṇḍala, as it appears in the non-dual Śaiva traditions of Kashmir, as a helpful point of comparison with the cross. It centers on two instances in which contemplating a shocking image becomes a theologically illuminating practice: Julian of Norwich’s contemplation on her vision of the crucifixion scene, and tantric meditations on Śiva in the terrible form of Bhairava. Reading these practices together yields an interpretation of the cross that disrupts the logical calculus of substitutionary atonement through sensory and imaginative encounters with an “at-one-ment” of divinization and solidarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":195231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atonement and Comparative Theology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atonement and Comparative Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823294350.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atonement and Comparative Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823294350.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章采用maṇḍala,因为它出现在克什米尔的非双重Śaiva传统,作为一个有用的比较点与十字架。它以两个例子为中心,在这两个例子中,对一个令人震惊的图像的思考成为了一种神学上的启蒙实践:诺维奇的朱利安(Julian of Norwich)对她所看到的十字架场景的沉思,以及以可怕的Bhairava形式对Śiva的密宗冥想。将这些实践结合在一起,就会产生一种对十字架的解释,这种解释打破了通过感官和想象与神化和团结的“合一”相遇来替代赎罪的逻辑演算。
This essay takes up the maṇḍala, as it appears in the non-dual Śaiva traditions of Kashmir, as a helpful point of comparison with the cross. It centers on two instances in which contemplating a shocking image becomes a theologically illuminating practice: Julian of Norwich’s contemplation on her vision of the crucifixion scene, and tantric meditations on Śiva in the terrible form of Bhairava. Reading these practices together yields an interpretation of the cross that disrupts the logical calculus of substitutionary atonement through sensory and imaginative encounters with an “at-one-ment” of divinization and solidarity.