被过去所困:外国税收债务的执行

Michael Dirkis
{"title":"被过去所困:外国税收债务的执行","authors":"Michael Dirkis","doi":"10.53300/001C.6709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, the Courts have not enforced the revenue laws of foreign governments. However, there have been developments internationally through the OECD to reverse that historic limitation on the collection of foreign country taxes. As a result of these changes Australia has adopted, in its bi-lateral tax treaties (DTAs) since 2005, a mutual assistance in tax debt collections article. These DTA changes have been reinforced with changes to Australia’s domestic law. This article explores the extent to which the historical position has been altered.","PeriodicalId":306257,"journal":{"name":"Revenue Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being Caught Up By The Past: The Enforcement Of Foreign Revenue Debts\",\"authors\":\"Michael Dirkis\",\"doi\":\"10.53300/001C.6709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historically, the Courts have not enforced the revenue laws of foreign governments. However, there have been developments internationally through the OECD to reverse that historic limitation on the collection of foreign country taxes. As a result of these changes Australia has adopted, in its bi-lateral tax treaties (DTAs) since 2005, a mutual assistance in tax debt collections article. These DTA changes have been reinforced with changes to Australia’s domestic law. This article explores the extent to which the historical position has been altered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revenue Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revenue Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.6709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revenue Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001C.6709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从历史上看,法院没有执行过外国政府的税收法。然而,通过经合发组织在国际上取得了一些进展,扭转了对征收外国税收的历史限制。由于这些变化,澳大利亚自2005年以来在其双边税收协定(dta)中采用了税收债务征收互助条款。这些DTA的变化随着澳大利亚国内法的变化而得到加强。这篇文章探讨了历史地位被改变的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Being Caught Up By The Past: The Enforcement Of Foreign Revenue Debts
Historically, the Courts have not enforced the revenue laws of foreign governments. However, there have been developments internationally through the OECD to reverse that historic limitation on the collection of foreign country taxes. As a result of these changes Australia has adopted, in its bi-lateral tax treaties (DTAs) since 2005, a mutual assistance in tax debt collections article. These DTA changes have been reinforced with changes to Australia’s domestic law. This article explores the extent to which the historical position has been altered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信