不测试调试

Wided Ghardallou, Nafi Diallo, A. Mili, M. Frias
{"title":"不测试调试","authors":"Wided Ghardallou, Nafi Diallo, A. Mili, M. Frias","doi":"10.1109/ICST.2016.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is so inconceivable to debug a program without testing it that these two words are used nearly interchangeably. Yet we argue that using the concept of relative correctness we can indeed remove a fault from a program and prove that the fault has been removed, by proving that the new program is more correct than the original. This is a departure from the traditional roles of proving and testing methods, whereby static proof methods are applied to a correct program to prove its correctness, and dynamic testing methods are applied to an incorrect program to expose its faults.","PeriodicalId":155554,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debugging without Testing\",\"authors\":\"Wided Ghardallou, Nafi Diallo, A. Mili, M. Frias\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICST.2016.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is so inconceivable to debug a program without testing it that these two words are used nearly interchangeably. Yet we argue that using the concept of relative correctness we can indeed remove a fault from a program and prove that the fault has been removed, by proving that the new program is more correct than the original. This is a departure from the traditional roles of proving and testing methods, whereby static proof methods are applied to a correct program to prove its correctness, and dynamic testing methods are applied to an incorrect program to expose its faults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2016.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2016.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

不测试就调试一个程序是不可思议的,所以这两个词几乎可以互换使用。然而,我们认为,使用相对正确性的概念,我们确实可以通过证明新程序比原程序更正确,从程序中消除错误并证明错误已被消除。这偏离了证明和测试方法的传统角色,即静态证明方法应用于正确的程序以证明其正确性,而动态测试方法应用于不正确的程序以暴露其错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debugging without Testing
It is so inconceivable to debug a program without testing it that these two words are used nearly interchangeably. Yet we argue that using the concept of relative correctness we can indeed remove a fault from a program and prove that the fault has been removed, by proving that the new program is more correct than the original. This is a departure from the traditional roles of proving and testing methods, whereby static proof methods are applied to a correct program to prove its correctness, and dynamic testing methods are applied to an incorrect program to expose its faults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信