一个基于推荐的系统,帮助非技术用户管理Android权限

Arnaud Oglaza, R. Laborde, A. Benzekri, F. Barrère
{"title":"一个基于推荐的系统,帮助非技术用户管理Android权限","authors":"Arnaud Oglaza, R. Laborde, A. Benzekri, F. Barrère","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2016.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, permissions management solutions on mobile devices employ Identity Based Access Control (IBAC) models. If this approach was suitable when people had only a few games (like Snake or Tetris) installed on their mobile phones, the current situation is different. A survey from Google in 2013 showed that, on average, US users have installed 33 applications on their Android smartphones. As a result, these users must manage hundreds of permissions to protect their privacy. Scalability of IBAC is a well-known issue and many more advanced access control models have introduced abstractions to cope with this problem. However, such models are more complex to handle by non-technical users. Thus, we present a permission management system for Android devices that 1) learns users' privacy preferences, 2) proposes them abstract authorization rules, and 3) provides advanced features to manage these high-level rules. We prove this approach is more efficient than current permission management system by comparing it to Privacy Guard Manager.","PeriodicalId":216417,"journal":{"name":"2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Recommender-Based System for Assisting Non-technical Users in Managing Android Permissions\",\"authors\":\"Arnaud Oglaza, R. Laborde, A. Benzekri, F. Barrère\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2016.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, permissions management solutions on mobile devices employ Identity Based Access Control (IBAC) models. If this approach was suitable when people had only a few games (like Snake or Tetris) installed on their mobile phones, the current situation is different. A survey from Google in 2013 showed that, on average, US users have installed 33 applications on their Android smartphones. As a result, these users must manage hundreds of permissions to protect their privacy. Scalability of IBAC is a well-known issue and many more advanced access control models have introduced abstractions to cope with this problem. However, such models are more complex to handle by non-technical users. Thus, we present a permission management system for Android devices that 1) learns users' privacy preferences, 2) proposes them abstract authorization rules, and 3) provides advanced features to manage these high-level rules. We prove this approach is more efficient than current permission management system by comparing it to Privacy Guard Manager.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2016.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2016.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

今天,移动设备上的权限管理解决方案采用基于身份的访问控制(IBAC)模型。如果这种方法适用于只有少量游戏(游戏邦注:如《贪吃蛇》或《俄罗斯方块》)的用户,那么当前的情况就不同了。谷歌2013年的一项调查显示,美国用户平均在他们的安卓智能手机上安装了33个应用程序。因此,这些用户必须管理数百个权限来保护他们的隐私。IBAC的可伸缩性是一个众所周知的问题,许多更高级的访问控制模型已经引入了抽象来处理这个问题。然而,对于非技术用户来说,这样的模型处理起来更加复杂。因此,我们提出了一个Android设备的权限管理系统,该系统1)学习用户的隐私偏好,2)向用户提出抽象的授权规则,3)提供高级功能来管理这些高级规则。通过与Privacy Guard Manager的比较,我们证明了这种方法比当前的权限管理系统更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Recommender-Based System for Assisting Non-technical Users in Managing Android Permissions
Today, permissions management solutions on mobile devices employ Identity Based Access Control (IBAC) models. If this approach was suitable when people had only a few games (like Snake or Tetris) installed on their mobile phones, the current situation is different. A survey from Google in 2013 showed that, on average, US users have installed 33 applications on their Android smartphones. As a result, these users must manage hundreds of permissions to protect their privacy. Scalability of IBAC is a well-known issue and many more advanced access control models have introduced abstractions to cope with this problem. However, such models are more complex to handle by non-technical users. Thus, we present a permission management system for Android devices that 1) learns users' privacy preferences, 2) proposes them abstract authorization rules, and 3) provides advanced features to manage these high-level rules. We prove this approach is more efficient than current permission management system by comparing it to Privacy Guard Manager.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信