法院在解决法律利益冲突中的司法适用

S. Burmistrova
{"title":"法院在解决法律利益冲突中的司法适用","authors":"S. Burmistrova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-12-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the widespread consolidation of the principle of justice in normative acts, its law enforcement significance continues to be debatable, while the analysis of judicial practice shows that courts often use the noted moral and ethical principle as a basis for resolving conflicts of substantive, procedural interests, including in cases where such conflicts are based on conflicting principles of law. It is significant that the free operation of the category of justice is peculiar to the verification instances, while for the first and initial verification instances the content of the principle of justice and its application to the settlement of disputes continues to be obscure. In order to solve this problem, the article attempts to determine the content of justice and derive a formula for its practical use.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Justice by Court in Solution of Conflicts of Legal Interests\",\"authors\":\"S. Burmistrova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-12-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the widespread consolidation of the principle of justice in normative acts, its law enforcement significance continues to be debatable, while the analysis of judicial practice shows that courts often use the noted moral and ethical principle as a basis for resolving conflicts of substantive, procedural interests, including in cases where such conflicts are based on conflicting principles of law. It is significant that the free operation of the category of justice is peculiar to the verification instances, while for the first and initial verification instances the content of the principle of justice and its application to the settlement of disputes continues to be obscure. In order to solve this problem, the article attempts to determine the content of justice and derive a formula for its practical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-12-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-2-12-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在规范行为中普遍巩固了正义原则,但其执法意义仍然存在争议,而对司法实践的分析表明,法院经常使用著名的道德和伦理原则作为解决实质性、程序性利益冲突的基础,包括在这种冲突基于相互冲突的法律原则的情况下。重要的是,司法范畴的自由运作是核查案件所特有的,而对于第一次和最初的核查案件,司法原则的内容及其对解决争端的适用仍然模糊不清。为了解决这一问题,本文试图确定正义的内容,并推导出一个适用于实践的公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Justice by Court in Solution of Conflicts of Legal Interests
Despite the widespread consolidation of the principle of justice in normative acts, its law enforcement significance continues to be debatable, while the analysis of judicial practice shows that courts often use the noted moral and ethical principle as a basis for resolving conflicts of substantive, procedural interests, including in cases where such conflicts are based on conflicting principles of law. It is significant that the free operation of the category of justice is peculiar to the verification instances, while for the first and initial verification instances the content of the principle of justice and its application to the settlement of disputes continues to be obscure. In order to solve this problem, the article attempts to determine the content of justice and derive a formula for its practical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信