基于运营情景认知冲突的铁路事故偶然模型

Fei Yan, T. Tang, Junqiao Ma
{"title":"基于运营情景认知冲突的铁路事故偶然模型","authors":"Fei Yan, T. Tang, Junqiao Ma","doi":"10.1109/ICIRT.2018.8641574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, accident or incident analysis are focusing on the cause-consequence chain methods, like Fault Tree or Event Tree, which are hard to find root cause of accidents. To solve this problem, some system safety analysis methods come out, like Accimap, FRAM and CAST based on STAMP. However, they are good at solving safety management issues, functional failure analysis or causal scenarios analysis, and can be used to capture safety requirements and help system designers to deep understand safety requirements. But the true logic of accident or incident do not analyzed, which is related to human or equipment cannot conceive the right status of train operational status on time. If so, it's easy to ensure safety by train stop. The objective of this paper is to present the mismatch or inconsistency among human cognition, equipment execution and train operation of railway train control system. Also, railway accident is a kind of expression of operational scenario conflict. Singapore metro accident is analyzed as case study.","PeriodicalId":202415,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Accident Casual Model for Railway Based on Operational Scenario Cognition Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Fei Yan, T. Tang, Junqiao Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIRT.2018.8641574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, accident or incident analysis are focusing on the cause-consequence chain methods, like Fault Tree or Event Tree, which are hard to find root cause of accidents. To solve this problem, some system safety analysis methods come out, like Accimap, FRAM and CAST based on STAMP. However, they are good at solving safety management issues, functional failure analysis or causal scenarios analysis, and can be used to capture safety requirements and help system designers to deep understand safety requirements. But the true logic of accident or incident do not analyzed, which is related to human or equipment cannot conceive the right status of train operational status on time. If so, it's easy to ensure safety by train stop. The objective of this paper is to present the mismatch or inconsistency among human cognition, equipment execution and train operation of railway train control system. Also, railway accident is a kind of expression of operational scenario conflict. Singapore metro accident is analyzed as case study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRT.2018.8641574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRT.2018.8641574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传统的事故或事件分析多采用因果链方法,如故障树或事件树等,难以找到事故的根本原因。为了解决这一问题,提出了基于STAMP的Accimap、FRAM和CAST等系统安全分析方法。但它们擅长解决安全管理问题、功能失效分析或因果场景分析,可以用来捕捉安全需求,帮助系统设计人员深入了解安全需求。但没有对事故或事件的真实逻辑进行分析,这涉及到人或设备无法设想列车运行状态的正确状态。如果是这样的话,坐火车就很容易保证安全了。本文的目的是揭示铁路列控系统中人的认知、设备的执行和列车运行之间的不匹配或不一致。同时,铁路事故也是作战情景冲突的一种表现形式。以新加坡地铁事故为个案进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Accident Casual Model for Railway Based on Operational Scenario Cognition Conflict
Traditionally, accident or incident analysis are focusing on the cause-consequence chain methods, like Fault Tree or Event Tree, which are hard to find root cause of accidents. To solve this problem, some system safety analysis methods come out, like Accimap, FRAM and CAST based on STAMP. However, they are good at solving safety management issues, functional failure analysis or causal scenarios analysis, and can be used to capture safety requirements and help system designers to deep understand safety requirements. But the true logic of accident or incident do not analyzed, which is related to human or equipment cannot conceive the right status of train operational status on time. If so, it's easy to ensure safety by train stop. The objective of this paper is to present the mismatch or inconsistency among human cognition, equipment execution and train operation of railway train control system. Also, railway accident is a kind of expression of operational scenario conflict. Singapore metro accident is analyzed as case study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信