基于优化的机组承诺方法:拉格朗日松弛与一般混合整数规划

X. Guan, Q. Zhai, Alex Papalexopoulos
{"title":"基于优化的机组承诺方法:拉格朗日松弛与一般混合整数规划","authors":"X. Guan, Q. Zhai, Alex Papalexopoulos","doi":"10.1109/PES.2003.1270468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lagrangian relaxation (LR) and general mixed integer programming (MIP) are two main approaches for solving unit commitment (UC) problems. This paper compares the LR and the state of art general MIP method for solving UC problems based on performance analysis and numerical testing. In this paper we have rigorously proved that UC is indeed an NP complete problem, and therefore it is impossible to develop an algorithm with polynomial computation time to solve it. In comparison with the general MIP methods, the LR methodology is more scaleable and efficient to obtain near optimal schedules for large scale and hard UC problems at the cost of a small percentage of deviation from the optimal solution. In particular, solving hydro generation subproblems within the LR framework can take advantages of both LR and general MIP methods and provide a synergetic combination of both approaches.","PeriodicalId":131986,"journal":{"name":"2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization based methods for unit commitment: Lagrangian relaxation versus general mixed integer programming\",\"authors\":\"X. Guan, Q. Zhai, Alex Papalexopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PES.2003.1270468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lagrangian relaxation (LR) and general mixed integer programming (MIP) are two main approaches for solving unit commitment (UC) problems. This paper compares the LR and the state of art general MIP method for solving UC problems based on performance analysis and numerical testing. In this paper we have rigorously proved that UC is indeed an NP complete problem, and therefore it is impossible to develop an algorithm with polynomial computation time to solve it. In comparison with the general MIP methods, the LR methodology is more scaleable and efficient to obtain near optimal schedules for large scale and hard UC problems at the cost of a small percentage of deviation from the optimal solution. In particular, solving hydro generation subproblems within the LR framework can take advantages of both LR and general MIP methods and provide a synergetic combination of both approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2003.1270468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2003.1270468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

拉格朗日松弛(LR)和一般混合整数规划(MIP)是解决机组承诺问题的两种主要方法。在性能分析和数值测试的基础上,比较了LR和目前通用的MIP方法在解决UC问题中的应用。在本文中,我们严格地证明了UC确实是一个NP完全问题,因此不可能开发一个计算时间为多项式的算法来解决它。与一般的MIP方法相比,LR方法具有更高的可扩展性和效率,可以在与最优解偏差很小的情况下获得大规模和困难的UC问题的近最优调度。特别是,在LR框架内解决水力发电子问题可以利用LR和一般MIP方法的优势,并提供两种方法的协同组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization based methods for unit commitment: Lagrangian relaxation versus general mixed integer programming
Lagrangian relaxation (LR) and general mixed integer programming (MIP) are two main approaches for solving unit commitment (UC) problems. This paper compares the LR and the state of art general MIP method for solving UC problems based on performance analysis and numerical testing. In this paper we have rigorously proved that UC is indeed an NP complete problem, and therefore it is impossible to develop an algorithm with polynomial computation time to solve it. In comparison with the general MIP methods, the LR methodology is more scaleable and efficient to obtain near optimal schedules for large scale and hard UC problems at the cost of a small percentage of deviation from the optimal solution. In particular, solving hydro generation subproblems within the LR framework can take advantages of both LR and general MIP methods and provide a synergetic combination of both approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信