静态迟滞模型识别协议的比较

2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG) Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825

M. Longhitano, F. Sixdenier, R. Scorretti, C. Geuzaine, F. Henrotte, L. Krähenbühl

{"title":"静态迟滞模型识别协议的比较","authors":"M. Longhitano, F. Sixdenier, R. Scorretti, C. Geuzaine, F. Henrotte, L. Krähenbühl","doi":"10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to predict magnetic quantities in the magnetic cores of electrical devices, scientists and engineers need hysteresis models sufficiently accurate. Whatever the chosen model, a parameter identification protocol has to be elaborated requiring specific material measurements. This article compares two parameter identification protocols for the same hysteresis model. The protocols, their input and output data, and their accuracy are described in detail and discussed.","PeriodicalId":317315,"journal":{"name":"2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of identification protocols of a static hysteresis model\",\"authors\":\"M. Longhitano, F. Sixdenier, R. Scorretti, C. Geuzaine, F. Henrotte, L. Krähenbühl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to predict magnetic quantities in the magnetic cores of electrical devices, scientists and engineers need hysteresis models sufficiently accurate. Whatever the chosen model, a parameter identification protocol has to be elaborated requiring specific material measurements. This article compares two parameter identification protocols for the same hysteresis model. The protocols, their input and output data, and their accuracy are described in detail and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":317315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPUMAG45669.2019.9032825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为了预测电子器件磁芯中的磁量，科学家和工程师需要足够精确的磁滞模型。无论选择何种模型，都必须制定参数识别协议，要求进行具体的材料测量。本文对同一迟滞模型的两种参数识别协议进行了比较。对协议、输入输出数据及其准确性进行了详细的描述和讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of identification protocols of a static hysteresis model

In order to predict magnetic quantities in the magnetic cores of electrical devices, scientists and engineers need hysteresis models sufficiently accurate. Whatever the chosen model, a parameter identification protocol has to be elaborated requiring specific material measurements. This article compares two parameter identification protocols for the same hysteresis model. The protocols, their input and output data, and their accuracy are described in detail and discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2019 22nd International Conference on the Computation of Electromagnetic Fields (COMPUMAG)

自引率

0.00%

发文量