抗议者和战术升级

Yongshun Cai
{"title":"抗议者和战术升级","authors":"Yongshun Cai","doi":"10.1017/9789048535248.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social groups that take to the streets do not necessarily achieve their\n desired effects because the protest may be weak. Hence, protesting groups\n need to carry out tactical escalation in order to empower their action.\n Examining the Umbrella Movement of 2014, this paper suggests that the\n effectiveness of tactical escalation is not determined only by the public\n support it can generate, but also by the timing of the escalation because\n this timing reveals the movement’s momentum. The tactical escalation\n of the Umbrella Movement proved to be ineffective because some tactics\n damaged the movement’s image or were undertaken at a time when the\n momentum was already significantly low.","PeriodicalId":292370,"journal":{"name":"The Umbrella Movement","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protesters and Tactical Escalation\",\"authors\":\"Yongshun Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9789048535248.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social groups that take to the streets do not necessarily achieve their\\n desired effects because the protest may be weak. Hence, protesting groups\\n need to carry out tactical escalation in order to empower their action.\\n Examining the Umbrella Movement of 2014, this paper suggests that the\\n effectiveness of tactical escalation is not determined only by the public\\n support it can generate, but also by the timing of the escalation because\\n this timing reveals the movement’s momentum. The tactical escalation\\n of the Umbrella Movement proved to be ineffective because some tactics\\n damaged the movement’s image or were undertaken at a time when the\\n momentum was already significantly low.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Umbrella Movement\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Umbrella Movement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048535248.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Umbrella Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048535248.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

社会团体走上街头并不一定能达到预期的效果,因为抗议可能是软弱的。因此,抗议团体需要进行战术升级,以授权他们的行动。通过对2014年雨伞运动的考察,本文认为战术升级的有效性不仅取决于它所能产生的公众支持,还取决于升级的时机,因为这个时机揭示了运动的势头。雨伞运动的战术升级被证明是无效的,因为一些战术损害了运动的形象,或者是在势头已经很低的时候采取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protesters and Tactical Escalation
Social groups that take to the streets do not necessarily achieve their desired effects because the protest may be weak. Hence, protesting groups need to carry out tactical escalation in order to empower their action. Examining the Umbrella Movement of 2014, this paper suggests that the effectiveness of tactical escalation is not determined only by the public support it can generate, but also by the timing of the escalation because this timing reveals the movement’s momentum. The tactical escalation of the Umbrella Movement proved to be ineffective because some tactics damaged the movement’s image or were undertaken at a time when the momentum was already significantly low.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信