BProVe:业务流程模型的正式验证框架

F. Corradini, Fabrizio Fornari, A. Polini, B. Re, F. Tiezzi, Andrea Vandin
{"title":"BProVe:业务流程模型的正式验证框架","authors":"F. Corradini, Fabrizio Fornari, A. Polini, B. Re, F. Tiezzi, Andrea Vandin","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business Process Modelling has acquired increasing relevance in software development. Available notations, such as BPMN, permit to describe activities of complex organisations. On the one hand, this shortens the communication gap between domain experts and IT specialists. On the other hand, this permits to clarify the characteristics of software systems introduced to provide automatic support for such activities. Nevertheless, the lack of formal semantics hinders the automatic verification of relevant properties. This paper presents a novel verification framework for BPMN 2.0, called BProVe. It is based on an operational semantics, implemented using MAUDE, devised to make the verification general and effective. A complete tool chain, based on the Eclipse modelling environment, allows for rigorous modelling and analysis of Business Processes. The approach has been validated using more than one thousand models available on a publicly accessible repository. Besides showing the performance of BProVe, this validation demonstrates its practical benefits in identifying correctness issues in real models.","PeriodicalId":382876,"journal":{"name":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BProVe: A formal verification framework for business process models\",\"authors\":\"F. Corradini, Fabrizio Fornari, A. Polini, B. Re, F. Tiezzi, Andrea Vandin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business Process Modelling has acquired increasing relevance in software development. Available notations, such as BPMN, permit to describe activities of complex organisations. On the one hand, this shortens the communication gap between domain experts and IT specialists. On the other hand, this permits to clarify the characteristics of software systems introduced to provide automatic support for such activities. Nevertheless, the lack of formal semantics hinders the automatic verification of relevant properties. This paper presents a novel verification framework for BPMN 2.0, called BProVe. It is based on an operational semantics, implemented using MAUDE, devised to make the verification general and effective. A complete tool chain, based on the Eclipse modelling environment, allows for rigorous modelling and analysis of Business Processes. The approach has been validated using more than one thousand models available on a publicly accessible repository. Besides showing the performance of BProVe, this validation demonstrates its practical benefits in identifying correctness issues in real models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

业务过程建模在软件开发中获得了越来越多的相关性。可用的符号,如BPMN,允许描述复杂组织的活动。一方面,这缩短了领域专家和IT专家之间的沟通差距。另一方面,这允许澄清为这些活动提供自动支持而引入的软件系统的特征。然而,缺乏形式化语义阻碍了相关属性的自动验证。本文提出了一个新的BPMN 2.0验证框架,称为BProVe。它基于操作语义,使用MAUDE实现,旨在使验证通用且有效。基于Eclipse建模环境的完整工具链允许对业务流程进行严格的建模和分析。该方法已经在一个可公开访问的存储库上使用了一千多个模型进行了验证。除了展示BProVe的性能之外,这个验证还展示了它在识别真实模型中的正确性问题方面的实际好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BProVe: A formal verification framework for business process models
Business Process Modelling has acquired increasing relevance in software development. Available notations, such as BPMN, permit to describe activities of complex organisations. On the one hand, this shortens the communication gap between domain experts and IT specialists. On the other hand, this permits to clarify the characteristics of software systems introduced to provide automatic support for such activities. Nevertheless, the lack of formal semantics hinders the automatic verification of relevant properties. This paper presents a novel verification framework for BPMN 2.0, called BProVe. It is based on an operational semantics, implemented using MAUDE, devised to make the verification general and effective. A complete tool chain, based on the Eclipse modelling environment, allows for rigorous modelling and analysis of Business Processes. The approach has been validated using more than one thousand models available on a publicly accessible repository. Besides showing the performance of BProVe, this validation demonstrates its practical benefits in identifying correctness issues in real models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信