{"title":"下颌种植体保留固定Adoro融合金属Fp-1假体与上颌丙烯酸可摘常规全口义齿的全口康复","authors":"Ashish R Jain, P. Ariga, L. Mahesh","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: According to previous studies, persons wearing implant-retained prostheses may create bite forces comparable to those possessing natural dentition and it has been suggested that the risk for combination syndrome increases in persons wearing mandibular implant-retained prostheses opposed to maxillary complete dentures. Aim: This article presents the fabrication of a maxillary conventional complete denture opposing a mandibular implant retained fixed prosthesis and evaluates the changes in the edentulous maxilla and prostheses over a period of 2 years. Case description: A comprehensive treatment included a conventional removable complete denture for the upper arch and a six implant supported fixed prosthesis for the lower arch. Conclusion: This article reports on the fabrication of a maxillary conventional complete denture opposing a mandibular implantretained full fixed prosthesis. Occlusion and articulation were found to be good over a period of 2 years. Retention and stability were found to be good uptill the 18 months review and moderate at the 24 months review. Clinical significance: To preserve anterior maxillary bone, a balanced occlusal concept has been recommended for implantretained mandibular prostheses opposing a tissue supported conventional maxillary complete denture. In this case, the patient was rehabilitated with a balanced occlusion without anterior tooth contact in maximal intercuspation.","PeriodicalId":303737,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full Mouth Rehabilitation of a Patient having Limited Interarch Space with Mandibular Implant Retained Fixed Adoro Fused to Metal Fp-1 Prosthesis and Maxillary Acrylic Removable Conventional Complete Denture\",\"authors\":\"Ashish R Jain, P. Ariga, L. Mahesh\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: According to previous studies, persons wearing implant-retained prostheses may create bite forces comparable to those possessing natural dentition and it has been suggested that the risk for combination syndrome increases in persons wearing mandibular implant-retained prostheses opposed to maxillary complete dentures. Aim: This article presents the fabrication of a maxillary conventional complete denture opposing a mandibular implant retained fixed prosthesis and evaluates the changes in the edentulous maxilla and prostheses over a period of 2 years. Case description: A comprehensive treatment included a conventional removable complete denture for the upper arch and a six implant supported fixed prosthesis for the lower arch. Conclusion: This article reports on the fabrication of a maxillary conventional complete denture opposing a mandibular implantretained full fixed prosthesis. Occlusion and articulation were found to be good over a period of 2 years. Retention and stability were found to be good uptill the 18 months review and moderate at the 24 months review. Clinical significance: To preserve anterior maxillary bone, a balanced occlusal concept has been recommended for implantretained mandibular prostheses opposing a tissue supported conventional maxillary complete denture. In this case, the patient was rehabilitated with a balanced occlusion without anterior tooth contact in maximal intercuspation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Full Mouth Rehabilitation of a Patient having Limited Interarch Space with Mandibular Implant Retained Fixed Adoro Fused to Metal Fp-1 Prosthesis and Maxillary Acrylic Removable Conventional Complete Denture
Background: According to previous studies, persons wearing implant-retained prostheses may create bite forces comparable to those possessing natural dentition and it has been suggested that the risk for combination syndrome increases in persons wearing mandibular implant-retained prostheses opposed to maxillary complete dentures. Aim: This article presents the fabrication of a maxillary conventional complete denture opposing a mandibular implant retained fixed prosthesis and evaluates the changes in the edentulous maxilla and prostheses over a period of 2 years. Case description: A comprehensive treatment included a conventional removable complete denture for the upper arch and a six implant supported fixed prosthesis for the lower arch. Conclusion: This article reports on the fabrication of a maxillary conventional complete denture opposing a mandibular implantretained full fixed prosthesis. Occlusion and articulation were found to be good over a period of 2 years. Retention and stability were found to be good uptill the 18 months review and moderate at the 24 months review. Clinical significance: To preserve anterior maxillary bone, a balanced occlusal concept has been recommended for implantretained mandibular prostheses opposing a tissue supported conventional maxillary complete denture. In this case, the patient was rehabilitated with a balanced occlusion without anterior tooth contact in maximal intercuspation.