性取向和收入:来自英国的新证据

C. Aksoy, Christopher S. Carpenter, J. Frank
{"title":"性取向和收入:来自英国的新证据","authors":"C. Aksoy, Christopher S. Carpenter, J. Frank","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3119665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most prior work on sexual orientation and labour market earnings has relied either on individual-level surveys with small samples of sexual minorities or has used large samples of same-sex couples. We use a large individual-level dataset that allows us to measure both constructs. We replicate the well-documented lesbian advantage and gay male penalty in couples-based comparisons but show that these effects are absent in similarly specified models of non-partnered workers. This suggests both that couples-based samples overstate the true earnings differences attributable to a minority sexual orientation and that household specialisation plays an important role in the lesbian earnings advantage. Finally, we discuss how the effects reconcile with theories of specialisation and discrimination.","PeriodicalId":196465,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution (Topic)","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Orientation and Earnings: New Evidence from the UK\",\"authors\":\"C. Aksoy, Christopher S. Carpenter, J. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3119665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most prior work on sexual orientation and labour market earnings has relied either on individual-level surveys with small samples of sexual minorities or has used large samples of same-sex couples. We use a large individual-level dataset that allows us to measure both constructs. We replicate the well-documented lesbian advantage and gay male penalty in couples-based comparisons but show that these effects are absent in similarly specified models of non-partnered workers. This suggests both that couples-based samples overstate the true earnings differences attributable to a minority sexual orientation and that household specialisation plays an important role in the lesbian earnings advantage. Finally, we discuss how the effects reconcile with theories of specialisation and discrimination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3119665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

大多数先前关于性取向和劳动力市场收入的研究要么依赖于性少数群体的小样本个人调查,要么依赖于同性伴侣的大样本调查。我们使用了一个大型的个人数据集,使我们能够测量这两种结构。我们在以伴侣为基础的比较中复制了充分证明的女同性恋优势和男同性恋劣势,但表明这些影响在类似的非伴侣员工模型中不存在。这表明,基于夫妻的样本夸大了由少数性取向引起的真实收入差异,而家庭专业化在女同性恋的收入优势中起着重要作用。最后,我们讨论了这些效应如何与专业化和歧视理论相协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexual Orientation and Earnings: New Evidence from the UK
Most prior work on sexual orientation and labour market earnings has relied either on individual-level surveys with small samples of sexual minorities or has used large samples of same-sex couples. We use a large individual-level dataset that allows us to measure both constructs. We replicate the well-documented lesbian advantage and gay male penalty in couples-based comparisons but show that these effects are absent in similarly specified models of non-partnered workers. This suggests both that couples-based samples overstate the true earnings differences attributable to a minority sexual orientation and that household specialisation plays an important role in the lesbian earnings advantage. Finally, we discuss how the effects reconcile with theories of specialisation and discrimination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信