{"title":"译码转发中继的错误界限","authors":"Alexandre Graell i Amat, I. Land, L. Rasmussen","doi":"10.1109/EW.2010.5483536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze and compare the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder and the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) decoder for coding over a decode-and-forward relay network with orthogonal channels. Using a specific model for the errors introduced by the relay, we derive an optimal MAP decoder that operates on a super-trellis and estimates jointly the transmitted codeword and the error pattern introduced by the relay. Furthermore we present analytical expressions for the error rates for both ML and MAP decoding.","PeriodicalId":232165,"journal":{"name":"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error bounds for decode-and-forward relaying\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Graell i Amat, I. Land, L. Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EW.2010.5483536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze and compare the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder and the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) decoder for coding over a decode-and-forward relay network with orthogonal channels. Using a specific model for the errors introduced by the relay, we derive an optimal MAP decoder that operates on a super-trellis and estimates jointly the transmitted codeword and the error pattern introduced by the relay. Furthermore we present analytical expressions for the error rates for both ML and MAP decoding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EW.2010.5483536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 European Wireless Conference (EW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EW.2010.5483536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We analyze and compare the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder and the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) decoder for coding over a decode-and-forward relay network with orthogonal channels. Using a specific model for the errors introduced by the relay, we derive an optimal MAP decoder that operates on a super-trellis and estimates jointly the transmitted codeword and the error pattern introduced by the relay. Furthermore we present analytical expressions for the error rates for both ML and MAP decoding.