关于单变量插值局部方法的注意事项

ACM Signum Newsletter Pub Date : 1996-04-01 DOI:10.1145/230922.230924

H. Akima

{"title":"关于单变量插值局部方法的注意事项","authors":"H. Akima","doi":"10.1145/230922.230924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five local methods or algorithms of univariate interpolation are mutually compared both numerically and graphically. They are Ackland's osculatory method (J. Inst. Actuar. 49, 369-375, 1915), Algorithm 433 (Commun. ACM 15, 914-918, 1972), Maude's method (Computer J. 16, 64-65, 1973), Algorithm 514 (ACM TOMS 3, 175-178, 1977), and Algorithm 697 (ACM TOMS 17, 367, 1991). The comparison results indicate that Algorithm 697 is the best among these five methods.","PeriodicalId":177516,"journal":{"name":"ACM Signum Newsletter","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Note on local methods of univariate interpolation\",\"authors\":\"H. Akima\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/230922.230924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Five local methods or algorithms of univariate interpolation are mutually compared both numerically and graphically. They are Ackland's osculatory method (J. Inst. Actuar. 49, 369-375, 1915), Algorithm 433 (Commun. ACM 15, 914-918, 1972), Maude's method (Computer J. 16, 64-65, 1973), Algorithm 514 (ACM TOMS 3, 175-178, 1977), and Algorithm 697 (ACM TOMS 17, 367, 1991). The comparison results indicate that Algorithm 697 is the best among these five methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/230922.230924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Signum Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/230922.230924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对单变量插值的五种局部方法或算法进行了数值和图形的相互比较。它们是Ackland’s oscatory method (J. Inst. Actuar. 49, 369-375, 1915)， Algorithm 433 (common。ACM 15, 914- 918,1972)， Maude的方法(Computer J. 16, 64-65, 1973)，算法514 (ACM TOMS 3, 175-178, 1977)和算法697 (ACM TOMS 17, 367, 1991)。比较结果表明，算法697是这5种方法中效果最好的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Note on local methods of univariate interpolation

Five local methods or algorithms of univariate interpolation are mutually compared both numerically and graphically. They are Ackland's osculatory method (J. Inst. Actuar. 49, 369-375, 1915), Algorithm 433 (Commun. ACM 15, 914-918, 1972), Maude's method (Computer J. 16, 64-65, 1973), Algorithm 514 (ACM TOMS 3, 175-178, 1977), and Algorithm 697 (ACM TOMS 17, 367, 1991). The comparison results indicate that Algorithm 697 is the best among these five methods.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACM Signum Newsletter

自引率

0.00%

发文量