在俄乌混合战争中限制乌克兰在线信息自由

Pavlo Burdiak
{"title":"在俄乌混合战争中限制乌克兰在线信息自由","authors":"Pavlo Burdiak","doi":"10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2021.2.pp109-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the article is to examine the Law of Ukraine “On Sanctions” and provide an international law assessment of its application as an instrument for blocking (pro)Russian websites in Ukraine in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war. To accomplish the stated goal, two objectives are outlined. Firstly, to investigate the implementation of the Law “On Sanctions” for restricting access to (pro)Russian websites in the Ukrainian segment of the Internet. Secondly, to analyze the Law “On Sanctions” through the prism of three internationally accepted UN- and CoE-based criteria of permissible freedom of information limitations – legality, legitimacy, and necessity. The article found that since 2017, the Law “On Sanctions” has been employed for wholesale blocking of (pro)Russian websites originating from Russia, Crimea, ORDLO, and Ukraine controlled territory. These websites have been blocked either temporarily or permanently by im- posing sanctions on the associated legal and natural persons. Furthermore, it was determined that the wholesale blocking of (pro)Russian websites by applying the Law “On Sanctions” arguably violates the international standards, because only one of the three required criteria of permissible freedom of information limitations has been met. The blocking fulfills the legitimacy criterion, but fails to satisfy the criteria of legality and necessity.","PeriodicalId":270857,"journal":{"name":"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej","volume":"381 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restricting freedom of information online in Ukraine within the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war\",\"authors\":\"Pavlo Burdiak\",\"doi\":\"10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2021.2.pp109-130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of the article is to examine the Law of Ukraine “On Sanctions” and provide an international law assessment of its application as an instrument for blocking (pro)Russian websites in Ukraine in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war. To accomplish the stated goal, two objectives are outlined. Firstly, to investigate the implementation of the Law “On Sanctions” for restricting access to (pro)Russian websites in the Ukrainian segment of the Internet. Secondly, to analyze the Law “On Sanctions” through the prism of three internationally accepted UN- and CoE-based criteria of permissible freedom of information limitations – legality, legitimacy, and necessity. The article found that since 2017, the Law “On Sanctions” has been employed for wholesale blocking of (pro)Russian websites originating from Russia, Crimea, ORDLO, and Ukraine controlled territory. These websites have been blocked either temporarily or permanently by im- posing sanctions on the associated legal and natural persons. Furthermore, it was determined that the wholesale blocking of (pro)Russian websites by applying the Law “On Sanctions” arguably violates the international standards, because only one of the three required criteria of permissible freedom of information limitations has been met. The blocking fulfills the legitimacy criterion, but fails to satisfy the criteria of legality and necessity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej\",\"volume\":\"381 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2021.2.pp109-130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studium Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59861/ansgk.2353-8392.2021.2.pp109-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是检视乌克兰“制裁法”,并在俄乌混合战争的背景下,对其作为在乌克兰封锁(亲)俄罗斯网站的工具的应用提供国际法评估。为了实现既定目标,概述了两个目标。首先,调查“制裁法”的执行情况,以限制乌克兰互联网部分访问(亲)俄罗斯网站。其次,通过三个国际公认的基于联合国和欧盟的允许信息限制自由的标准——合法性、合法性和必要性——来分析《制裁法》。文章发现,自2017年以来,“制裁法”一直被用于大规模封锁来自俄罗斯、克里米亚、乌克兰和乌克兰控制领土的(亲)俄罗斯网站。通过对相关法人和自然人实施制裁,这些网站被暂时或永久封锁。此外,委员会确定,通过实施“制裁法”大规模封锁(亲)俄罗斯网站的做法可以说违反了国际标准,因为在允许的信息自由限制的三个必要标准中,只有一个得到了满足。封锁符合合法性标准,但不符合合法性和必要性标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restricting freedom of information online in Ukraine within the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war
The goal of the article is to examine the Law of Ukraine “On Sanctions” and provide an international law assessment of its application as an instrument for blocking (pro)Russian websites in Ukraine in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war. To accomplish the stated goal, two objectives are outlined. Firstly, to investigate the implementation of the Law “On Sanctions” for restricting access to (pro)Russian websites in the Ukrainian segment of the Internet. Secondly, to analyze the Law “On Sanctions” through the prism of three internationally accepted UN- and CoE-based criteria of permissible freedom of information limitations – legality, legitimacy, and necessity. The article found that since 2017, the Law “On Sanctions” has been employed for wholesale blocking of (pro)Russian websites originating from Russia, Crimea, ORDLO, and Ukraine controlled territory. These websites have been blocked either temporarily or permanently by im- posing sanctions on the associated legal and natural persons. Furthermore, it was determined that the wholesale blocking of (pro)Russian websites by applying the Law “On Sanctions” arguably violates the international standards, because only one of the three required criteria of permissible freedom of information limitations has been met. The blocking fulfills the legitimacy criterion, but fails to satisfy the criteria of legality and necessity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信