论黑格尔的辩证无限观

Zhang Hong
{"title":"论黑格尔的辩证无限观","authors":"Zhang Hong","doi":"10.22158/jrph.v6n1p8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that the problem of finity and infinity is the basic problem of mathematics, and it is also the basic problem of Philosophy. From the perspective of philosophy and mathematics, this paper comprehensively reviews and analyzes Hegel’s view of dialectical infinity, introduces Engels’discussion on infinity, deeply analyzes the characteristics of the thought of actual infinity, and points out: Hegel’s thought of real infinity is completely different from the thought of actual infinity, the Being of infinity (objective infinity) is not equal to the completed infinity (subjective infinity), the mathematical limit is a real infinity, and real infinity is the inner law of infinite things and truth; the view of actual infinity views the objective material world from the viewpoint of static rather than motion, denying the contradiction between finity and infinity, so it is actually a downright idealist. In this paper, the author puts forward the Infinite Exchange Paradox, which strongly questions the idea of actual infinity in Hilbert Hotel Problem, and points out the internal irreconcilable contradiction in the idea of actual infinity. At the same time, we made a detailed comparison of Hegel’s view of infinity and the view of mathematical infinity, and on this basis, the author gives a complete definition of the view of dialectical infinity: abandoning the wrong aspects of the potential infinity and actual infinity, and actively absorbing correct aspects of both, that is, not only to recognize the existence and knowability of infinite objectivity, but also to admit the imcompletion of infinite process. The reexcavation of Hegel’s view of dialectical infinity and the criticism of the actual infinity thought aim to find possible philosophical solutions for Russell’s Paradox and the problem of Continuum Hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":229607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Hegel’s View of Dialectical Infinity\",\"authors\":\"Zhang Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/jrph.v6n1p8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that the problem of finity and infinity is the basic problem of mathematics, and it is also the basic problem of Philosophy. From the perspective of philosophy and mathematics, this paper comprehensively reviews and analyzes Hegel’s view of dialectical infinity, introduces Engels’discussion on infinity, deeply analyzes the characteristics of the thought of actual infinity, and points out: Hegel’s thought of real infinity is completely different from the thought of actual infinity, the Being of infinity (objective infinity) is not equal to the completed infinity (subjective infinity), the mathematical limit is a real infinity, and real infinity is the inner law of infinite things and truth; the view of actual infinity views the objective material world from the viewpoint of static rather than motion, denying the contradiction between finity and infinity, so it is actually a downright idealist. In this paper, the author puts forward the Infinite Exchange Paradox, which strongly questions the idea of actual infinity in Hilbert Hotel Problem, and points out the internal irreconcilable contradiction in the idea of actual infinity. At the same time, we made a detailed comparison of Hegel’s view of infinity and the view of mathematical infinity, and on this basis, the author gives a complete definition of the view of dialectical infinity: abandoning the wrong aspects of the potential infinity and actual infinity, and actively absorbing correct aspects of both, that is, not only to recognize the existence and knowability of infinite objectivity, but also to admit the imcompletion of infinite process. The reexcavation of Hegel’s view of dialectical infinity and the criticism of the actual infinity thought aim to find possible philosophical solutions for Russell’s Paradox and the problem of Continuum Hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v6n1p8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v6n1p8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,有限与无穷问题是数学的基本问题,也是哲学的基本问题。本文从哲学和数学的角度,全面回顾和分析了黑格尔的辩证无限性观,介绍了恩格斯关于无限性的论述,深入分析了实际无限性思想的特点,指出:黑格尔的实在无限思想与实在无限思想是完全不同的,无限的存在(客观的无限)不等于完全的无限(主观的无限),数学的极限是实在的无限,实在的无限是无限事物和无限真理的内在规律;实际无限性是从静止的而不是从运动的观点来看待客观物质世界的,它否认有限与无限的矛盾,因此它实际上是一个彻头彻尾的唯心主义者。本文提出了“无限交换悖论”,对希尔伯特饭店问题中的“实际无限性”概念提出了强烈的质疑,指出了“实际无限性”概念的内在不可调和的矛盾。同时,对黑格尔的无限观和数学的无限观作了详细的比较,在此基础上,给出了辩证无限观的完整定义:抛弃潜在无限和现实无限的错误方面,积极吸收两者的正确方面,即既承认无限客观性的存在性和可知性,又承认无限过程的不完全性。对黑格尔辩证无限性观的重新挖掘和对现实无限性思想的批判,旨在为罗素悖论和连续统假设问题寻找可能的哲学解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Hegel’s View of Dialectical Infinity
It is well known that the problem of finity and infinity is the basic problem of mathematics, and it is also the basic problem of Philosophy. From the perspective of philosophy and mathematics, this paper comprehensively reviews and analyzes Hegel’s view of dialectical infinity, introduces Engels’discussion on infinity, deeply analyzes the characteristics of the thought of actual infinity, and points out: Hegel’s thought of real infinity is completely different from the thought of actual infinity, the Being of infinity (objective infinity) is not equal to the completed infinity (subjective infinity), the mathematical limit is a real infinity, and real infinity is the inner law of infinite things and truth; the view of actual infinity views the objective material world from the viewpoint of static rather than motion, denying the contradiction between finity and infinity, so it is actually a downright idealist. In this paper, the author puts forward the Infinite Exchange Paradox, which strongly questions the idea of actual infinity in Hilbert Hotel Problem, and points out the internal irreconcilable contradiction in the idea of actual infinity. At the same time, we made a detailed comparison of Hegel’s view of infinity and the view of mathematical infinity, and on this basis, the author gives a complete definition of the view of dialectical infinity: abandoning the wrong aspects of the potential infinity and actual infinity, and actively absorbing correct aspects of both, that is, not only to recognize the existence and knowability of infinite objectivity, but also to admit the imcompletion of infinite process. The reexcavation of Hegel’s view of dialectical infinity and the criticism of the actual infinity thought aim to find possible philosophical solutions for Russell’s Paradox and the problem of Continuum Hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信