{"title":"秘鲁采矿和碳氢化合物的冲突和社会战略:参与环境影响评估的不同用途","authors":"Maiah Jaskoski","doi":"10.4067/s0718-090x2021005000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how local communities mobilized against extraction use the public hearing that is part of environmental impact assessment. Based on analysis of thirteen important hydrocarbon and mining conflicts in Peru, it observes that in some cases communities acted within the provided participatory space, whereas in other cases they organized “around” or “in reaction” to it, using the institutional procedures as focal points for escalating conflict. The study explains variation in community uses of the hearing using three variables: the stage of planned extraction at the time that conflict broke out; whether the project design placed mobilized actors inside or outside of the project’s area of direct impact; and the degree of unity among the “insiders.”","PeriodicalId":279932,"journal":{"name":"Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflicto y estrategia social en la minería y los hidrocarburos peruanos: Los usos variados de la participación en la evaluación de impacto ambiental\",\"authors\":\"Maiah Jaskoski\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-090x2021005000123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines how local communities mobilized against extraction use the public hearing that is part of environmental impact assessment. Based on analysis of thirteen important hydrocarbon and mining conflicts in Peru, it observes that in some cases communities acted within the provided participatory space, whereas in other cases they organized “around” or “in reaction” to it, using the institutional procedures as focal points for escalating conflict. The study explains variation in community uses of the hearing using three variables: the stage of planned extraction at the time that conflict broke out; whether the project design placed mobilized actors inside or outside of the project’s area of direct impact; and the degree of unity among the “insiders.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":279932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2021005000123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2021005000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conflicto y estrategia social en la minería y los hidrocarburos peruanos: Los usos variados de la participación en la evaluación de impacto ambiental
This article examines how local communities mobilized against extraction use the public hearing that is part of environmental impact assessment. Based on analysis of thirteen important hydrocarbon and mining conflicts in Peru, it observes that in some cases communities acted within the provided participatory space, whereas in other cases they organized “around” or “in reaction” to it, using the institutional procedures as focal points for escalating conflict. The study explains variation in community uses of the hearing using three variables: the stage of planned extraction at the time that conflict broke out; whether the project design placed mobilized actors inside or outside of the project’s area of direct impact; and the degree of unity among the “insiders.”