{"title":"使用交互图的正式规范","authors":"K. Lano","doi":"10.1109/SEFM.2007.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interaction diagrams are a widely-used UML notation, however in contrast to class diagrams or state machines there is a lack of formal semantics for interaction diagrams. We propose a formal semantics for the notation, and consider applications of this semantics for checking the consistency of interaction diagrams with other UML models, and for diagrammatic formal specification of real-time properties.","PeriodicalId":212544,"journal":{"name":"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Specification using Interaction Diagrams\",\"authors\":\"K. Lano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEFM.2007.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interaction diagrams are a widely-used UML notation, however in contrast to class diagrams or state machines there is a lack of formal semantics for interaction diagrams. We propose a formal semantics for the notation, and consider applications of this semantics for checking the consistency of interaction diagrams with other UML models, and for diagrammatic formal specification of real-time properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2007.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2007.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interaction diagrams are a widely-used UML notation, however in contrast to class diagrams or state machines there is a lack of formal semantics for interaction diagrams. We propose a formal semantics for the notation, and consider applications of this semantics for checking the consistency of interaction diagrams with other UML models, and for diagrammatic formal specification of real-time properties.