但现在他们谴责这只是偏执的借口

Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty? Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI:10.1093/oso/9780197500989.003.0003

A. Koppelman

{"title":"但现在他们谴责这只是偏执的借口","authors":"A. Koppelman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197500989.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A few high-profile struggles transformed the perception of religious liberty. Beginning as recently as 2014, the Left began to regard a few individuals who refused to facilitate same-sex weddings—wedding photographer Elaine Huguenin, Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, baker Jack Phillips—as the paradigm for religious dissent. Soon the term came to be seen as an excuse for discrimination.","PeriodicalId":149656,"journal":{"name":"Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"But now they denounce it as a mere excuse for bigotry\",\"authors\":\"A. Koppelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197500989.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A few high-profile struggles transformed the perception of religious liberty. Beginning as recently as 2014, the Left began to regard a few individuals who refused to facilitate same-sex weddings—wedding photographer Elaine Huguenin, Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, baker Jack Phillips—as the paradigm for religious dissent. Soon the term came to be seen as an excuse for discrimination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197500989.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197500989.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

一些引人注目的斗争改变了人们对宗教自由的看法。从最近的2014年开始，左派开始把一些拒绝为同性婚礼提供便利的人——婚礼摄影师伊莱恩·休格宁、肯塔基县办事员金·戴维斯、面包师杰克·菲利普斯——视为宗教异议的典范。很快，这个词就被视为歧视的借口。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

But now they denounce it as a mere excuse for bigotry

A few high-profile struggles transformed the perception of religious liberty. Beginning as recently as 2014, the Left began to regard a few individuals who refused to facilitate same-sex weddings—wedding photographer Elaine Huguenin, Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, baker Jack Phillips—as the paradigm for religious dissent. Soon the term came to be seen as an excuse for discrimination.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?

自引率

0.00%

发文量