垃圾邮件分类机器学习算法比较

Hery Iswanto, Erni Seniwati, Yuli Astuti, Dina Maulina
{"title":"垃圾邮件分类机器学习算法比较","authors":"Hery Iswanto, Erni Seniwati, Yuli Astuti, Dina Maulina","doi":"10.30645/ijistech.v5i4.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of email use and the convenience provided make email as the most frequently used means of communication. Along with its development, many parties are abusing the use of email as a means of advertising promotion, phishing and sending other unimportant emails. This information is called spam email. One of the efforts in overcoming the problem of spam emails is by filtering techniques based on the content of the email. In the first study related to the classification of spam emails, the Naïve Bayes method is the most commonly used method. Therefore, in this study researchers will add Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) methods to make comparisons in order to find which methods have better accuracy in classifying spam emails. Based on the results of the trial, the application of Naïve bayes classification algorithm in the classification of spam emails resulted in accuracy of 83.5%, Random Forest 83.5% and KNN 82.75%","PeriodicalId":355398,"journal":{"name":"IJISTECH (International Journal of Information System and Technology)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Algorithms on Machine Learning For Spam Email Classification\",\"authors\":\"Hery Iswanto, Erni Seniwati, Yuli Astuti, Dina Maulina\",\"doi\":\"10.30645/ijistech.v5i4.164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid development of email use and the convenience provided make email as the most frequently used means of communication. Along with its development, many parties are abusing the use of email as a means of advertising promotion, phishing and sending other unimportant emails. This information is called spam email. One of the efforts in overcoming the problem of spam emails is by filtering techniques based on the content of the email. In the first study related to the classification of spam emails, the Naïve Bayes method is the most commonly used method. Therefore, in this study researchers will add Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) methods to make comparisons in order to find which methods have better accuracy in classifying spam emails. Based on the results of the trial, the application of Naïve bayes classification algorithm in the classification of spam emails resulted in accuracy of 83.5%, Random Forest 83.5% and KNN 82.75%\",\"PeriodicalId\":355398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJISTECH (International Journal of Information System and Technology)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJISTECH (International Journal of Information System and Technology)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v5i4.164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJISTECH (International Journal of Information System and Technology)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30645/ijistech.v5i4.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

电子邮件使用的迅速发展及其提供的便利使电子邮件成为最常用的通信手段。随着电子邮件的发展,许多人滥用电子邮件作为广告推广、网络钓鱼和发送其他不重要的电子邮件的手段。这些信息被称为垃圾邮件。克服垃圾邮件问题的努力之一是通过基于邮件内容的过滤技术。在第一个关于垃圾邮件分类的研究中,Naïve贝叶斯方法是最常用的方法。因此,在本研究中,研究人员将加入随机森林和k -最近邻(KNN)方法进行比较,以找出哪种方法在垃圾邮件分类中具有更好的准确性。从试验结果来看,Naïve贝叶斯分类算法在垃圾邮件分类中的应用准确率为83.5%,Random Forest为83.5%,KNN为82.75%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Algorithms on Machine Learning For Spam Email Classification
The rapid development of email use and the convenience provided make email as the most frequently used means of communication. Along with its development, many parties are abusing the use of email as a means of advertising promotion, phishing and sending other unimportant emails. This information is called spam email. One of the efforts in overcoming the problem of spam emails is by filtering techniques based on the content of the email. In the first study related to the classification of spam emails, the Naïve Bayes method is the most commonly used method. Therefore, in this study researchers will add Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) methods to make comparisons in order to find which methods have better accuracy in classifying spam emails. Based on the results of the trial, the application of Naïve bayes classification algorithm in the classification of spam emails resulted in accuracy of 83.5%, Random Forest 83.5% and KNN 82.75%
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信