生活质量测量、研究和政策的综合方法

R. Costanza, B. Fisher, Saleem H. Ali, Caroline C. Beer, L. Bond, R. Boumans, N. Danigelis, J. Dickinson, Carolyn Elliott, J. Farley, Diane Elliott Gayer, Linda MacDonald Glenn, T. Hudspeth, D. Mahoney, L. Mccahill, B. Mcintosh, B. Reed, S. Rizvi, D. Rizzo, T. Simpatico, R. Snapp
{"title":"生活质量测量、研究和政策的综合方法","authors":"R. Costanza, B. Fisher, Saleem H. Ali, Caroline C. Beer, L. Bond, R. Boumans, N. Danigelis, J. Dickinson, Carolyn Elliott, J. Farley, Diane Elliott Gayer, Linda MacDonald Glenn, T. Hudspeth, D. Mahoney, L. Mccahill, B. Mcintosh, B. Reed, S. Rizvi, D. Rizzo, T. Simpatico, R. Snapp","doi":"10.5194/SAPIENS-1-11-2008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Quality of Life (QOL) has long been an explicit or implicit policy goal, adequate definition and measurement have been elusive. Diverse \"objective\" and \"subjective\" indicators across a range of disci- plines and scales, and recent work on subjective well-being (SWB) surveys and the psychology of happiness have spurred renewed interest. Drawing from multiple disciplines, we present an integrative definition of QOL that combines measures of human needs with subjective well-being or happiness. QOL is proposed as a multi- scale, multi-dimensional concept that contains interacting objective and subjective elements. We relate QOL to the opportunities that are provided to meet human needs in the forms of built, human, social and natural capital (in addition to time) and the policy options that are available to enhance these opportunities. Issues related to defining, measuring, and scaling these concepts are discussed, and a research agenda is elaborated. Policy implications include strategies for investing in opportunities to maximize QOL enhancement at the individual, community, and national scales.","PeriodicalId":370994,"journal":{"name":"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"202","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Integrative Approach to Quality of Life Measurement, Research, and Policy\",\"authors\":\"R. Costanza, B. Fisher, Saleem H. Ali, Caroline C. Beer, L. Bond, R. Boumans, N. Danigelis, J. Dickinson, Carolyn Elliott, J. Farley, Diane Elliott Gayer, Linda MacDonald Glenn, T. Hudspeth, D. Mahoney, L. Mccahill, B. Mcintosh, B. Reed, S. Rizvi, D. Rizzo, T. Simpatico, R. Snapp\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/SAPIENS-1-11-2008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Quality of Life (QOL) has long been an explicit or implicit policy goal, adequate definition and measurement have been elusive. Diverse \\\"objective\\\" and \\\"subjective\\\" indicators across a range of disci- plines and scales, and recent work on subjective well-being (SWB) surveys and the psychology of happiness have spurred renewed interest. Drawing from multiple disciplines, we present an integrative definition of QOL that combines measures of human needs with subjective well-being or happiness. QOL is proposed as a multi- scale, multi-dimensional concept that contains interacting objective and subjective elements. We relate QOL to the opportunities that are provided to meet human needs in the forms of built, human, social and natural capital (in addition to time) and the policy options that are available to enhance these opportunities. Issues related to defining, measuring, and scaling these concepts are discussed, and a research agenda is elaborated. Policy implications include strategies for investing in opportunities to maximize QOL enhancement at the individual, community, and national scales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"202\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/SAPIENS-1-11-2008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/SAPIENS-1-11-2008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 202

摘要

虽然生活质量(QOL)长期以来一直是一个明确或隐含的政策目标,但适当的定义和测量一直难以捉摸。各种各样的“客观”和“主观”指标跨越了一系列学科和尺度,最近关于主观幸福感(SWB)调查和幸福心理学的工作激发了人们新的兴趣。从多个学科中,我们提出了生活质量的综合定义,将人类需求与主观幸福感或幸福感相结合。生活质量是一个多尺度、多维度的概念,它包含了客观因素和主观因素的相互作用。我们将生活质量与以建筑、人力、社会和自然资本(除了时间)的形式满足人类需求的机会以及可用于增加这些机会的政策选择联系起来。讨论了与定义、测量和缩放这些概念相关的问题,并详细阐述了研究议程。政策含义包括投资于机会的战略,以最大限度地提高个人、社区和国家层面的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Integrative Approach to Quality of Life Measurement, Research, and Policy
While Quality of Life (QOL) has long been an explicit or implicit policy goal, adequate definition and measurement have been elusive. Diverse "objective" and "subjective" indicators across a range of disci- plines and scales, and recent work on subjective well-being (SWB) surveys and the psychology of happiness have spurred renewed interest. Drawing from multiple disciplines, we present an integrative definition of QOL that combines measures of human needs with subjective well-being or happiness. QOL is proposed as a multi- scale, multi-dimensional concept that contains interacting objective and subjective elements. We relate QOL to the opportunities that are provided to meet human needs in the forms of built, human, social and natural capital (in addition to time) and the policy options that are available to enhance these opportunities. Issues related to defining, measuring, and scaling these concepts are discussed, and a research agenda is elaborated. Policy implications include strategies for investing in opportunities to maximize QOL enhancement at the individual, community, and national scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信