元认知策略及其未来研究的可能性

S. Locatelli
{"title":"元认知策略及其未来研究的可能性","authors":"S. Locatelli","doi":"10.48127/gu-nse/19.16.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basically, metacognition is composed of two central aspects, “knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition” (Schraw, 1998, p.113), being the last characteristic, fundamental in the teaching and learning of Sciences, since it is desirable that, from the previous knowledge of the students, the possibility of rethinking it, regulating it and, thus, approaching the scientific concepts. Usually, teachers use metacognitive principles in their classes, but they often do so in an unintentional way, which precisely distinguishes a common metacognitive strategy in which, intentionally, moments for reflection and reconstruction are offered to students.\nRegarding the regulatory aspect, the metacognitive strategies are promising in assisting learning in science. Schraw (1998) adds that the regulation provided by metacognitive activity may be a skill to be improved with these strategies in a conscious and intentional way by the student.","PeriodicalId":222493,"journal":{"name":"GAMTAMOKSLINIS UGDYMAS / NATURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION","volume":"30 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES AND POSSIBILITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH\",\"authors\":\"S. Locatelli\",\"doi\":\"10.48127/gu-nse/19.16.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Basically, metacognition is composed of two central aspects, “knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition” (Schraw, 1998, p.113), being the last characteristic, fundamental in the teaching and learning of Sciences, since it is desirable that, from the previous knowledge of the students, the possibility of rethinking it, regulating it and, thus, approaching the scientific concepts. Usually, teachers use metacognitive principles in their classes, but they often do so in an unintentional way, which precisely distinguishes a common metacognitive strategy in which, intentionally, moments for reflection and reconstruction are offered to students.\\nRegarding the regulatory aspect, the metacognitive strategies are promising in assisting learning in science. Schraw (1998) adds that the regulation provided by metacognitive activity may be a skill to be improved with these strategies in a conscious and intentional way by the student.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GAMTAMOKSLINIS UGDYMAS / NATURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GAMTAMOKSLINIS UGDYMAS / NATURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/19.16.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GAMTAMOKSLINIS UGDYMAS / NATURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/19.16.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本上,元认知由两个中心方面组成,“认知的知识和认知的调节”(Schraw, 1998, p.113),这是科学教学的最后一个特征,也是基本的,因为它是可取的,从学生以前的知识中,有可能重新思考它,调节它,从而接近科学概念。通常,教师在课堂上使用元认知原则,但他们往往以无意的方式这样做,这恰恰区分了一种常见的元认知策略,其中有意地为学生提供反思和重建的时刻。在调节方面,元认知策略在辅助科学学习方面很有前景。Schraw(1998)补充说,元认知活动提供的调节可能是一种技能,可以通过这些策略以有意识和有意的方式得到提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES AND POSSIBILITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Basically, metacognition is composed of two central aspects, “knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition” (Schraw, 1998, p.113), being the last characteristic, fundamental in the teaching and learning of Sciences, since it is desirable that, from the previous knowledge of the students, the possibility of rethinking it, regulating it and, thus, approaching the scientific concepts. Usually, teachers use metacognitive principles in their classes, but they often do so in an unintentional way, which precisely distinguishes a common metacognitive strategy in which, intentionally, moments for reflection and reconstruction are offered to students. Regarding the regulatory aspect, the metacognitive strategies are promising in assisting learning in science. Schraw (1998) adds that the regulation provided by metacognitive activity may be a skill to be improved with these strategies in a conscious and intentional way by the student.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信