{"title":"基民盟/基社盟矛盾的2017年竞选","authors":"C. Clemens","doi":"10.3167/GPS.2018.360204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four inter-related factors shaped the 2017 campaign of Angela\nMerkel’s CDU/CSU: (1) ambivalence over her successful modernization of the\nCDU; (2) fallout from her 2015 refugee policy; (3) a party strategy that bred\ncomplacency while mobilizing skeptics; and (4) tactical miscalculations.\nMerkel’s CDU/CSU came in first, but suffered record losses, while the rightwing\npopulist Alternative for Germany emerged as Germany’s third party.\nThe campaign, its result and—with a fragmented and polarized party system—\nher need to build another grand coalition all seemed sure to fuel recrimi -\nnations within the CDU/CSU over identity, strategy, and personnel in a post\nMerkel era.","PeriodicalId":128145,"journal":{"name":"Twilight of the Merkel Era","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CDU/CSU’s Ambivalent 2017 Campaign\",\"authors\":\"C. Clemens\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/GPS.2018.360204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Four inter-related factors shaped the 2017 campaign of Angela\\nMerkel’s CDU/CSU: (1) ambivalence over her successful modernization of the\\nCDU; (2) fallout from her 2015 refugee policy; (3) a party strategy that bred\\ncomplacency while mobilizing skeptics; and (4) tactical miscalculations.\\nMerkel’s CDU/CSU came in first, but suffered record losses, while the rightwing\\npopulist Alternative for Germany emerged as Germany’s third party.\\nThe campaign, its result and—with a fragmented and polarized party system—\\nher need to build another grand coalition all seemed sure to fuel recrimi -\\nnations within the CDU/CSU over identity, strategy, and personnel in a post\\nMerkel era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twilight of the Merkel Era\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twilight of the Merkel Era\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2018.360204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twilight of the Merkel Era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2018.360204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
四个相互关联的因素影响了安吉拉·默克尔领导的基民盟/基社盟2017年的竞选:(1)对她成功实现基民盟现代化的矛盾心理;(2) 2015年难民政策的后果;(3)一种滋生自满情绪、同时动员怀疑论者的政党战略;(4)战术误判。默克尔领导的基民盟/基社盟(CDU/CSU)位居第一，但损失创纪录，而右翼民粹主义政党德国新选择党(Alternative for Germany)成为德国第三大党。这次竞选，它的结果，以及在一个分裂和两极化的政党体系下，她建立另一个大联盟的需要，似乎肯定会助长基民盟/基社盟内部在身份、战略和后默克尔时代的人事方面的相互指责。
Four inter-related factors shaped the 2017 campaign of Angela
Merkel’s CDU/CSU: (1) ambivalence over her successful modernization of the
CDU; (2) fallout from her 2015 refugee policy; (3) a party strategy that bred
complacency while mobilizing skeptics; and (4) tactical miscalculations.
Merkel’s CDU/CSU came in first, but suffered record losses, while the rightwing
populist Alternative for Germany emerged as Germany’s third party.
The campaign, its result and—with a fragmented and polarized party system—
her need to build another grand coalition all seemed sure to fuel recrimi -
nations within the CDU/CSU over identity, strategy, and personnel in a post
Merkel era.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
