弱电网下可再生能源运行功率控制方法比较

Prithwiraj Roy Chowdhury, Ehab Soubaki, M. Manjrekar
{"title":"弱电网下可再生能源运行功率控制方法比较","authors":"Prithwiraj Roy Chowdhury, Ehab Soubaki, M. Manjrekar","doi":"10.1109/NAPS50074.2021.9449827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Renewable Energy Resource (RER) based power grid should be capable to deliver active power $(\\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}})$ and reactive power $(\\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}})$ to fulfill the customer load demand and maintain stability during a weak grid condition. A Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) can provide the demand $\\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}}$ and $\\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}}$ to the grid to maintain a stable power system. Traditionally adopted PI control-based Indirect Power Control (IPC) scheme controls VSI to inject required grid power but as the control is nonlinear, the time to reach the steady-state is longer than the desired. In this paper, we have discussed and compared Direct Power Control (DPC) and the inverter Flux Power Control (FPC) approach with the IPC approach to control the transients caused by the varying RERs and load throughout the day. Besides, due to the transmission line parameters and operations of power, current oscillations are common in a weak grid. In this comparative study, the concept for improving transient response is validated by MATLAB/Simulink for a 100KW 100KVAR grid-tied VSI system. Finally, the comparative performances of the controllers for a weak grid have been discussed.","PeriodicalId":170486,"journal":{"name":"2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Power Control Methods for Renewable Energy Resources Operating in a Weak Grid\",\"authors\":\"Prithwiraj Roy Chowdhury, Ehab Soubaki, M. Manjrekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS50074.2021.9449827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Renewable Energy Resource (RER) based power grid should be capable to deliver active power $(\\\\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}})$ and reactive power $(\\\\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}})$ to fulfill the customer load demand and maintain stability during a weak grid condition. A Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) can provide the demand $\\\\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}}$ and $\\\\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}}$ to the grid to maintain a stable power system. Traditionally adopted PI control-based Indirect Power Control (IPC) scheme controls VSI to inject required grid power but as the control is nonlinear, the time to reach the steady-state is longer than the desired. In this paper, we have discussed and compared Direct Power Control (DPC) and the inverter Flux Power Control (FPC) approach with the IPC approach to control the transients caused by the varying RERs and load throughout the day. Besides, due to the transmission line parameters and operations of power, current oscillations are common in a weak grid. In this comparative study, the concept for improving transient response is validated by MATLAB/Simulink for a 100KW 100KVAR grid-tied VSI system. Finally, the comparative performances of the controllers for a weak grid have been discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS50074.2021.9449827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS50074.2021.9449827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于可再生能源(RER)的电网应该能够提供有功功率$(\boldsymbol{P}_{{grid}})$和无功功率$(\boldsymbol{Q}_{{grid}})$,以满足客户的负荷需求,并在弱电条件下保持稳定。电压源逆变器(VSI)可以向电网提供需求$\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}}$和$\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}}$,以维持电力系统的稳定。传统上采用的基于PI控制的间接功率控制(IPC)方案控制VSI注入所需的电网功率,但由于控制是非线性的,达到稳态的时间比期望的要长。在本文中,我们讨论和比较了直接功率控制(DPC)和逆变磁链功率控制(FPC)方法与IPC方法来控制全天变化的RERs和负载引起的暂态。此外,由于输电线路的参数和电力的运行,在弱电网中电流振荡是常见的。在此对比研究中,通过MATLAB/Simulink对100KW 100KVAR并网VSI系统的暂态响应进行了验证。最后,对弱电网下各控制器的性能进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Power Control Methods for Renewable Energy Resources Operating in a Weak Grid
A Renewable Energy Resource (RER) based power grid should be capable to deliver active power $(\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}})$ and reactive power $(\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}})$ to fulfill the customer load demand and maintain stability during a weak grid condition. A Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) can provide the demand $\boldsymbol{P}_{{GRID}}$ and $\boldsymbol{Q}_{{GRID}}$ to the grid to maintain a stable power system. Traditionally adopted PI control-based Indirect Power Control (IPC) scheme controls VSI to inject required grid power but as the control is nonlinear, the time to reach the steady-state is longer than the desired. In this paper, we have discussed and compared Direct Power Control (DPC) and the inverter Flux Power Control (FPC) approach with the IPC approach to control the transients caused by the varying RERs and load throughout the day. Besides, due to the transmission line parameters and operations of power, current oscillations are common in a weak grid. In this comparative study, the concept for improving transient response is validated by MATLAB/Simulink for a 100KW 100KVAR grid-tied VSI system. Finally, the comparative performances of the controllers for a weak grid have been discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信