Andressa Kappaun, Karine Camargo, Fábio Medeiros Rangel, Fabrício Firmino de Faria, P. Lima, Jonice Oliveira
{"title":"评估WiSARD的二进制编码技术","authors":"Andressa Kappaun, Karine Camargo, Fábio Medeiros Rangel, Fabrício Firmino de Faria, P. Lima, Jonice Oliveira","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many weightless neural networks, such as WiSARD, are RAM-based classifiers that receive binary data as input. In order to convert raw data into binary input, several techniques are applicable. This work evaluates the impact of some of these binarization techniques on the accuracy of two types of classifiers: WiSARD model and WiSARD with bleaching mechanism. The binary encoding techniques explored were: (i) thermometer, (ii) threshold, (iii) local threshold, (iv) Marr-Hildreth filter, and (v) Laplacian filter. The MNIST digit dataset was used to compare the accuracy obtained by each encoding technique. Results showed a difference of more than 20% in the accuracy due to the choice of encoding approach.","PeriodicalId":183149,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Binary Encoding Techniques for WiSARD\",\"authors\":\"Andressa Kappaun, Karine Camargo, Fábio Medeiros Rangel, Fabrício Firmino de Faria, P. Lima, Jonice Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many weightless neural networks, such as WiSARD, are RAM-based classifiers that receive binary data as input. In order to convert raw data into binary input, several techniques are applicable. This work evaluates the impact of some of these binarization techniques on the accuracy of two types of classifiers: WiSARD model and WiSARD with bleaching mechanism. The binary encoding techniques explored were: (i) thermometer, (ii) threshold, (iii) local threshold, (iv) Marr-Hildreth filter, and (v) Laplacian filter. The MNIST digit dataset was used to compare the accuracy obtained by each encoding technique. Results showed a difference of more than 20% in the accuracy due to the choice of encoding approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Many weightless neural networks, such as WiSARD, are RAM-based classifiers that receive binary data as input. In order to convert raw data into binary input, several techniques are applicable. This work evaluates the impact of some of these binarization techniques on the accuracy of two types of classifiers: WiSARD model and WiSARD with bleaching mechanism. The binary encoding techniques explored were: (i) thermometer, (ii) threshold, (iii) local threshold, (iv) Marr-Hildreth filter, and (v) Laplacian filter. The MNIST digit dataset was used to compare the accuracy obtained by each encoding technique. Results showed a difference of more than 20% in the accuracy due to the choice of encoding approach.