定义人工智能概念的方法:问题设置

A. Chebotareva, Yulia P. Keropyan
{"title":"定义人工智能概念的方法:问题设置","authors":"A. Chebotareva, Yulia P. Keropyan","doi":"10.18572/1811-1475-2023-2-38-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the main approaches to the definition of the concept of artificial intelligence in the scientific literature, normative legal acts and judicial practice, this is due to the fact that in the available scientific papers a comprehensive approach to understanding the legal nature of artificial intelligence, its law enforcement and, accordingly, the legal regulation is not sufficiently developed. The authors used methods: analysis and synthesis, comparative legal method of research. Results. The study noted that the definitions considered to a greater extent have technical characteristics, in this connection, raises the question associated with the development of the definition of «artificial intelligence», in terms of law. This is necessary, first of all, in order to further form a clear understanding of the legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in the legal field. The authors also draw attention to the fact that currently law enforcement has not developed a unified approach to the use of the concept of «artificial intelligence», in addition, judicial practice in this direction is at its initial stage of development.","PeriodicalId":210234,"journal":{"name":"Juridical World","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Defining the Artificial Intelligence Concept: Problem Setting\",\"authors\":\"A. Chebotareva, Yulia P. Keropyan\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1811-1475-2023-2-38-42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the main approaches to the definition of the concept of artificial intelligence in the scientific literature, normative legal acts and judicial practice, this is due to the fact that in the available scientific papers a comprehensive approach to understanding the legal nature of artificial intelligence, its law enforcement and, accordingly, the legal regulation is not sufficiently developed. The authors used methods: analysis and synthesis, comparative legal method of research. Results. The study noted that the definitions considered to a greater extent have technical characteristics, in this connection, raises the question associated with the development of the definition of «artificial intelligence», in terms of law. This is necessary, first of all, in order to further form a clear understanding of the legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in the legal field. The authors also draw attention to the fact that currently law enforcement has not developed a unified approach to the use of the concept of «artificial intelligence», in addition, judicial practice in this direction is at its initial stage of development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical World\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2023-2-38-42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1811-1475-2023-2-38-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了科学文献、规范性法律行为和司法实践中对人工智能概念定义的主要方法,这是由于现有的科学论文对人工智能的法律性质、其执法以及相应的法律规制的全面理解不够。作者采用了分析综合法、比较法等研究方法。结果。研究报告指出,所审议的定义在更大程度上具有技术特征,在这方面,提出了从法律角度发展“人工智能”定义的相关问题。这是必要的,首先是为了进一步形成对法律领域使用人工智能的法律规制的清晰认识。作者还注意到,目前执法部门对“人工智能”概念的使用还没有形成统一的方法,司法实践在这方面也处于初级发展阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to Defining the Artificial Intelligence Concept: Problem Setting
This article analyzes the main approaches to the definition of the concept of artificial intelligence in the scientific literature, normative legal acts and judicial practice, this is due to the fact that in the available scientific papers a comprehensive approach to understanding the legal nature of artificial intelligence, its law enforcement and, accordingly, the legal regulation is not sufficiently developed. The authors used methods: analysis and synthesis, comparative legal method of research. Results. The study noted that the definitions considered to a greater extent have technical characteristics, in this connection, raises the question associated with the development of the definition of «artificial intelligence», in terms of law. This is necessary, first of all, in order to further form a clear understanding of the legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in the legal field. The authors also draw attention to the fact that currently law enforcement has not developed a unified approach to the use of the concept of «artificial intelligence», in addition, judicial practice in this direction is at its initial stage of development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信