河流预测误差方法与子空间识别方法的比较

H. Nasir, E. Weyer
{"title":"河流预测误差方法与子空间识别方法的比较","authors":"H. Nasir, E. Weyer","doi":"10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data based modelling is an important tool in the operation and management of rivers. In this paper, we compare Prediction Error Methods (PEM) and Subspace Identification Methods (SIM) for system identification of rivers. PEM can incorporate the available prior information and can accommodate the non-linearities in the model structure with ease. The models obtained by SIM are linear, and it is generally difficult to incorporate prior information, but SIM is well suited to MIMO systems such as rivers. In this paper, we simulate a few typical river scenarios and use the simulated data to obtain PEM and SIM based models. The models are compared using several measures and for the scenarios considered it is found that PEM has an edge over SIM.","PeriodicalId":177490,"journal":{"name":"2013 Australian Control Conference","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of prediction error methods and subspace identification methods for rivers\",\"authors\":\"H. Nasir, E. Weyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data based modelling is an important tool in the operation and management of rivers. In this paper, we compare Prediction Error Methods (PEM) and Subspace Identification Methods (SIM) for system identification of rivers. PEM can incorporate the available prior information and can accommodate the non-linearities in the model structure with ease. The models obtained by SIM are linear, and it is generally difficult to incorporate prior information, but SIM is well suited to MIMO systems such as rivers. In this paper, we simulate a few typical river scenarios and use the simulated data to obtain PEM and SIM based models. The models are compared using several measures and for the scenarios considered it is found that PEM has an edge over SIM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Australian Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Australian Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Australian Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUCC.2013.6697309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

基于数据的建模是河流运行和管理的重要工具。本文比较了预测误差法(PEM)和子空间识别法(SIM)在河流系统识别中的应用。PEM可以结合现有的先验信息,并且可以很容易地适应模型结构中的非线性。SIM模型是线性的,通常难以纳入先验信息,但SIM很适合多输入多输出系统,如河流。在本文中,我们模拟了几种典型的河流场景,并利用模拟数据获得了基于PEM和SIM的模型。使用几种测量方法对模型进行了比较,对于所考虑的场景,发现PEM比SIM具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of prediction error methods and subspace identification methods for rivers
Data based modelling is an important tool in the operation and management of rivers. In this paper, we compare Prediction Error Methods (PEM) and Subspace Identification Methods (SIM) for system identification of rivers. PEM can incorporate the available prior information and can accommodate the non-linearities in the model structure with ease. The models obtained by SIM are linear, and it is generally difficult to incorporate prior information, but SIM is well suited to MIMO systems such as rivers. In this paper, we simulate a few typical river scenarios and use the simulated data to obtain PEM and SIM based models. The models are compared using several measures and for the scenarios considered it is found that PEM has an edge over SIM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信