图上合并-分支随机游走的改进覆盖时间边界

C. Cooper, T. Radzik, Nicolás Rivera
{"title":"图上合并-分支随机游走的改进覆盖时间边界","authors":"C. Cooper, T. Radzik, Nicolás Rivera","doi":"10.1145/3087556.3087564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present improved bounds on the cover time of the coalescing-branching random walk process COBRA. The COBRA process, introduced in [Dutta et al., SPAA 2013], can be viewed as spreading a single item of information throughout an undirected graph in synchronised rounds. In each round, each vertex which has received the information in the previous round (possibly simultaneously from more than one neighbour and possibly not for the first time), 'pushes' the information to b randomly selected neighbours. The COBRA process is typically studied for integer branching rates b \\ge 2 (with the case b=1 corresponding to a random walk). The aim of the process is to propagate the information quickly, but with a limited number of transmissions per vertex per round. The cover time of COBRA is defined as the expected number of rounds until each vertex has received the information at least once. Our main results are a bound of O(m + (d_{\\max})^2\\log n) = O(n^2\\log n) on the COBRA cover time for an arbitrary connected graph with n vertices, m edges and the maximum vertex degree d_{\\max}, and a bound of O((r^2 + r/(1-\\lambda)) \\log n) for r-regular connected graphs with the second eigenvalue \\lambda. Our bounds improve the O(n^{11/4}\\log n) and ((r^4/\\phi^2)\\log^2 n) bounds shown in [Mitzenmacher et al., SPAA 2016], where \\phi is the conductance of the graph, and complement the O((1/(1-\\l))^3 \\log n) bound shown in [Cooper et al., PODC 2016]. We obtain our bounds by analysing the process called Biased Infection with Persistent Source (BIPS), which was introduced in [Cooper et al., PODC 2016] as a dual process for COBRA.","PeriodicalId":162994,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures","volume":"6 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Cover Time Bounds for the Coalescing-Branching Random Walk on Graphs\",\"authors\":\"C. Cooper, T. Radzik, Nicolás Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3087556.3087564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present improved bounds on the cover time of the coalescing-branching random walk process COBRA. The COBRA process, introduced in [Dutta et al., SPAA 2013], can be viewed as spreading a single item of information throughout an undirected graph in synchronised rounds. In each round, each vertex which has received the information in the previous round (possibly simultaneously from more than one neighbour and possibly not for the first time), 'pushes' the information to b randomly selected neighbours. The COBRA process is typically studied for integer branching rates b \\\\ge 2 (with the case b=1 corresponding to a random walk). The aim of the process is to propagate the information quickly, but with a limited number of transmissions per vertex per round. The cover time of COBRA is defined as the expected number of rounds until each vertex has received the information at least once. Our main results are a bound of O(m + (d_{\\\\max})^2\\\\log n) = O(n^2\\\\log n) on the COBRA cover time for an arbitrary connected graph with n vertices, m edges and the maximum vertex degree d_{\\\\max}, and a bound of O((r^2 + r/(1-\\\\lambda)) \\\\log n) for r-regular connected graphs with the second eigenvalue \\\\lambda. Our bounds improve the O(n^{11/4}\\\\log n) and ((r^4/\\\\phi^2)\\\\log^2 n) bounds shown in [Mitzenmacher et al., SPAA 2016], where \\\\phi is the conductance of the graph, and complement the O((1/(1-\\\\l))^3 \\\\log n) bound shown in [Cooper et al., PODC 2016]. We obtain our bounds by analysing the process called Biased Infection with Persistent Source (BIPS), which was introduced in [Cooper et al., PODC 2016] as a dual process for COBRA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures\",\"volume\":\"6 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3087556.3087564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3087556.3087564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

给出了改进的合并分支随机游走过程COBRA的覆盖时间边界。在[Dutta等人,SPAA 2013]中引入的COBRA过程可以被视为在同步回合中在无向图中传播单个信息。在每一轮中,每个在前一轮中接收到信息的顶点(可能同时从多个邻居那里接收到信息,也可能不是第一次)将信息“推送”给b个随机选择的邻居。COBRA过程通常研究整数分支率b \ge 2(情况b=1对应于随机漫步)。该过程的目的是快速传播信息,但每轮每个顶点的传输数量有限。COBRA的覆盖时间定义为每个顶点至少接收一次信息之前的预期轮数。我们的主要结果是,对于具有n个顶点,m条边和最大顶点度d_ {\max}的任意连通图,COBRA覆盖时间的界为O(m + (d_ {\max})^2 \log n) = O(n^2 \log n),对于具有第二个特征值\lambda的r-正则连通图,其界为O((r^2 + r/(1- \lambda)) \log n)。我们的界改进了[Mitzenmacher等人,SPAA 2016]中显示的O(n^{11/4}\log n)和(r^4/ \phi ^2) \log ^2 n)界,其中\phi是图的电导,并补充了[Cooper等人,PODC 2016]中显示的O((1/(1- \l))^3 \log n)界。我们通过分析称为持续源偏差感染(BIPS)的过程来获得边界,该过程在[Cooper等人,PODC 2016]中作为COBRA的双重过程引入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Cover Time Bounds for the Coalescing-Branching Random Walk on Graphs
We present improved bounds on the cover time of the coalescing-branching random walk process COBRA. The COBRA process, introduced in [Dutta et al., SPAA 2013], can be viewed as spreading a single item of information throughout an undirected graph in synchronised rounds. In each round, each vertex which has received the information in the previous round (possibly simultaneously from more than one neighbour and possibly not for the first time), 'pushes' the information to b randomly selected neighbours. The COBRA process is typically studied for integer branching rates b \ge 2 (with the case b=1 corresponding to a random walk). The aim of the process is to propagate the information quickly, but with a limited number of transmissions per vertex per round. The cover time of COBRA is defined as the expected number of rounds until each vertex has received the information at least once. Our main results are a bound of O(m + (d_{\max})^2\log n) = O(n^2\log n) on the COBRA cover time for an arbitrary connected graph with n vertices, m edges and the maximum vertex degree d_{\max}, and a bound of O((r^2 + r/(1-\lambda)) \log n) for r-regular connected graphs with the second eigenvalue \lambda. Our bounds improve the O(n^{11/4}\log n) and ((r^4/\phi^2)\log^2 n) bounds shown in [Mitzenmacher et al., SPAA 2016], where \phi is the conductance of the graph, and complement the O((1/(1-\l))^3 \log n) bound shown in [Cooper et al., PODC 2016]. We obtain our bounds by analysing the process called Biased Infection with Persistent Source (BIPS), which was introduced in [Cooper et al., PODC 2016] as a dual process for COBRA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信