预防效果持续多久?不同FES刺激频率在脑卒中肩关节半脱位随访期的比较研究

M. Dar, N. A. Hamzaid, M. O. Ibitoye, Ishamuddin, N. S. A. Latiff, N. Hasnan, A. Suhaimi, G. Davis
{"title":"预防效果持续多久?不同FES刺激频率在脑卒中肩关节半脱位随访期的比较研究","authors":"M. Dar, N. A. Hamzaid, M. O. Ibitoye, Ishamuddin, N. S. A. Latiff, N. Hasnan, A. Suhaimi, G. Davis","doi":"10.1109/IFESS.2014.7036761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is strong evidence on the positive effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in preventing shoulder subluxation (SS) following stroke. However, the extent of such intervention has not been weekly documented with regards to different stimulation frequencies. It is unknown whether high or low frequency (35 Hz or 20 Hz) has better potential in maintaining the FES effect in preventing SS during the follow-up period. Two participants underwent standard prescribed physiotherapy sessions in a rehabilitation centre during their hospitalisation period. Electrical stimulation was administered to their supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for up to 2 hours a day for 4 weeks. All stimulation parameters were set constant except the stimulation current, which depended on the subject tolerance, and stimulation frequency, which was set to high (35Hz: Subject A) and low (20 Hz: Subject B). No SS among the intervened subjects during the 4 weeks FES therapy period. The high (35 Hz) stimulation frequency prevented subluxation until the end of 4 weeks follow up period in Subject A while low stimulation (20 Hz) frequency stimulation maintained the effect for up to 2 weeks in Subject B. The effect of FES on SS could be maintained up to 4 weeks upon withdrawal without undergoing subsequent FES therapy. Given all parameters fixed and the stimulation current dependent on the subject's tolerance, high frequency stimulation (35Hz) may be recommended in a subluxation prevention programs to further maintain the stability of the shoulder joint.","PeriodicalId":268238,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 19th International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society Annual Conference (IFESS)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How long does the prevention effect last? A comparison of two case studies of different FES stimulation frequencies in stroke shoulder subluxation follow up period\",\"authors\":\"M. Dar, N. A. Hamzaid, M. O. Ibitoye, Ishamuddin, N. S. A. Latiff, N. Hasnan, A. Suhaimi, G. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IFESS.2014.7036761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is strong evidence on the positive effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in preventing shoulder subluxation (SS) following stroke. However, the extent of such intervention has not been weekly documented with regards to different stimulation frequencies. It is unknown whether high or low frequency (35 Hz or 20 Hz) has better potential in maintaining the FES effect in preventing SS during the follow-up period. Two participants underwent standard prescribed physiotherapy sessions in a rehabilitation centre during their hospitalisation period. Electrical stimulation was administered to their supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for up to 2 hours a day for 4 weeks. All stimulation parameters were set constant except the stimulation current, which depended on the subject tolerance, and stimulation frequency, which was set to high (35Hz: Subject A) and low (20 Hz: Subject B). No SS among the intervened subjects during the 4 weeks FES therapy period. The high (35 Hz) stimulation frequency prevented subluxation until the end of 4 weeks follow up period in Subject A while low stimulation (20 Hz) frequency stimulation maintained the effect for up to 2 weeks in Subject B. The effect of FES on SS could be maintained up to 4 weeks upon withdrawal without undergoing subsequent FES therapy. Given all parameters fixed and the stimulation current dependent on the subject's tolerance, high frequency stimulation (35Hz) may be recommended in a subluxation prevention programs to further maintain the stability of the shoulder joint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 19th International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society Annual Conference (IFESS)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 19th International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society Annual Conference (IFESS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IFESS.2014.7036761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 19th International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society Annual Conference (IFESS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IFESS.2014.7036761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有强有力的证据表明,功能性电刺激(FES)在预防中风后肩关节半脱位(SS)方面具有积极作用。然而,这种干预的程度并没有每周记录不同的刺激频率。在随访期间,高频率或低频率(35 Hz或20 Hz)在维持FES预防SS效果方面的潜力更好,目前尚不清楚。两名参与者在住院期间在康复中心接受了标准规定的物理治疗。对其冈上肌和三角后肌进行电刺激,每天2小时,持续4周。除刺激电流和刺激频率设置为高(受试者A为35Hz)、低(受试者B为20hz)外,其余刺激参数均保持不变。在FES治疗的4周时间内,被干预受试者均未发生SS。在受试者A中,高频率(35赫兹)刺激可防止半脱位,直到4周的随访期结束,而在受试者b中,低频率(20赫兹)刺激可维持长达2周的效果。FES对SS的影响可在停药后维持长达4周,而无需进行后续FES治疗。鉴于所有参数固定且刺激电流取决于受试者的耐受性,高频刺激(35Hz)可能被推荐用于预防半脱位方案,以进一步保持肩关节的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How long does the prevention effect last? A comparison of two case studies of different FES stimulation frequencies in stroke shoulder subluxation follow up period
There is strong evidence on the positive effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in preventing shoulder subluxation (SS) following stroke. However, the extent of such intervention has not been weekly documented with regards to different stimulation frequencies. It is unknown whether high or low frequency (35 Hz or 20 Hz) has better potential in maintaining the FES effect in preventing SS during the follow-up period. Two participants underwent standard prescribed physiotherapy sessions in a rehabilitation centre during their hospitalisation period. Electrical stimulation was administered to their supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for up to 2 hours a day for 4 weeks. All stimulation parameters were set constant except the stimulation current, which depended on the subject tolerance, and stimulation frequency, which was set to high (35Hz: Subject A) and low (20 Hz: Subject B). No SS among the intervened subjects during the 4 weeks FES therapy period. The high (35 Hz) stimulation frequency prevented subluxation until the end of 4 weeks follow up period in Subject A while low stimulation (20 Hz) frequency stimulation maintained the effect for up to 2 weeks in Subject B. The effect of FES on SS could be maintained up to 4 weeks upon withdrawal without undergoing subsequent FES therapy. Given all parameters fixed and the stimulation current dependent on the subject's tolerance, high frequency stimulation (35Hz) may be recommended in a subluxation prevention programs to further maintain the stability of the shoulder joint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信