用于疏散分析的微观和中观交通建模工具的比较

M. Aljamal, H. Rakha, Jianhe Du, Ihab El-Shawarby
{"title":"用于疏散分析的微观和中观交通建模工具的比较","authors":"M. Aljamal, H. Rakha, Jianhe Du, Ihab El-Shawarby","doi":"10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evacuation activities can be evaluated using different simulation models. However, recently, microscopic simulation models have become a more popular tool for this purpose. The objectives of this study are to model multiple evacuation scenarios and to compare a microscopic traffic simulation tool (in this case INTEGRATION) against a mesoscopic traffic simulation tool (MATSim). Given that the demand was the same for both models, the comparison was achieved based on two indicators: estimated evacuation time and average trip duration. The results show that the estimated evacuation times in both models are similar since the input traffic demand governed this measure. However, the evaluation also shows a considerable difference between the two models in the average trip duration. The microscopic traffic simulation tool produces logical results with trip durations increasing with increased traffic demand levels and decreasing road capacity scenarios, whereas the average trip duration using the mesoscopic simulation tool decreases with increasing demand levels and increasing road capacity scenarios.","PeriodicalId":395239,"journal":{"name":"2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Modeling Tools for Evacuation Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Aljamal, H. Rakha, Jianhe Du, Ihab El-Shawarby\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evacuation activities can be evaluated using different simulation models. However, recently, microscopic simulation models have become a more popular tool for this purpose. The objectives of this study are to model multiple evacuation scenarios and to compare a microscopic traffic simulation tool (in this case INTEGRATION) against a mesoscopic traffic simulation tool (MATSim). Given that the demand was the same for both models, the comparison was achieved based on two indicators: estimated evacuation time and average trip duration. The results show that the estimated evacuation times in both models are similar since the input traffic demand governed this measure. However, the evaluation also shows a considerable difference between the two models in the average trip duration. The microscopic traffic simulation tool produces logical results with trip durations increasing with increased traffic demand levels and decreasing road capacity scenarios, whereas the average trip duration using the mesoscopic simulation tool decreases with increasing demand levels and increasing road capacity scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

可以使用不同的模拟模型来评估疏散活动。然而,最近,微观模拟模型已经成为一种更流行的工具。本研究的目的是模拟多种疏散场景,并将微观交通模拟工具(在本例中为INTEGRATION)与中观交通模拟工具(MATSim)进行比较。由于两种模型的需求相同,因此根据估计疏散时间和平均行程时间两个指标进行比较。结果表明,由于输入交通需求对疏散时间的控制,两种模型的估计疏散时间是相似的。但是,评价也显示两种模型在平均行程时长上存在较大差异。微观交通模拟工具得出的逻辑结果是,出行时间随着交通需求水平的增加和道路容量的减少而增加,而使用中观模拟工具的平均出行时间随着需求水平的增加和道路容量的增加而减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Modeling Tools for Evacuation Analysis
Evacuation activities can be evaluated using different simulation models. However, recently, microscopic simulation models have become a more popular tool for this purpose. The objectives of this study are to model multiple evacuation scenarios and to compare a microscopic traffic simulation tool (in this case INTEGRATION) against a mesoscopic traffic simulation tool (MATSim). Given that the demand was the same for both models, the comparison was achieved based on two indicators: estimated evacuation time and average trip duration. The results show that the estimated evacuation times in both models are similar since the input traffic demand governed this measure. However, the evaluation also shows a considerable difference between the two models in the average trip duration. The microscopic traffic simulation tool produces logical results with trip durations increasing with increased traffic demand levels and decreasing road capacity scenarios, whereas the average trip duration using the mesoscopic simulation tool decreases with increasing demand levels and increasing road capacity scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信