《中国日报》和《纽约时报》新冠肺炎报道中模糊限制语的对比研究

Wang Ya’nan, Tian Zhiling, Wang Jinghua
{"title":"《中国日报》和《纽约时报》新冠肺炎报道中模糊限制语的对比研究","authors":"Wang Ya’nan, Tian Zhiling, Wang Jinghua","doi":"10.5539/ies.v16n1p42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on Jef Verschueren’s Adaptation Theory, Lakoff’s definition and Prince et al.’s classification of hedges, this paper takes New York Times and China Daily from January 23rd to April 8th, 2020 as corpus sources, randomly selects 39 COVID-19 reports, and makes a contrastive study of hedges among them, aiming at exploring the similarities and differences in the use of hedges in COVID-19 reports selected from Chinese and American mainstream newspapers and further revealing their influencing factors.","PeriodicalId":299098,"journal":{"name":"International Education Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Contrastive Study of Hedges in COVID-19 Reports Selected from China Daily and The New York Times\",\"authors\":\"Wang Ya’nan, Tian Zhiling, Wang Jinghua\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ies.v16n1p42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on Jef Verschueren’s Adaptation Theory, Lakoff’s definition and Prince et al.’s classification of hedges, this paper takes New York Times and China Daily from January 23rd to April 8th, 2020 as corpus sources, randomly selects 39 COVID-19 reports, and makes a contrastive study of hedges among them, aiming at exploring the similarities and differences in the use of hedges in COVID-19 reports selected from Chinese and American mainstream newspapers and further revealing their influencing factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Education Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Education Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n1p42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n1p42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以Jef Verschueren的顺应理论、Lakoff的定义和Prince等人对模糊限制语的分类为基础,以2020年1月23日至4月8日的《纽约时报》和《中国日报》为语料来源,随机选取39篇COVID-19报道,对其中的模糊限制语进行对比研究。旨在探讨中美两国主流报纸在新冠肺炎报道中模糊限制语使用的异同,并进一步揭示其影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Contrastive Study of Hedges in COVID-19 Reports Selected from China Daily and The New York Times
Based on Jef Verschueren’s Adaptation Theory, Lakoff’s definition and Prince et al.’s classification of hedges, this paper takes New York Times and China Daily from January 23rd to April 8th, 2020 as corpus sources, randomly selects 39 COVID-19 reports, and makes a contrastive study of hedges among them, aiming at exploring the similarities and differences in the use of hedges in COVID-19 reports selected from Chinese and American mainstream newspapers and further revealing their influencing factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信