转喻有多普遍?来自大规模多语言分析的结果

Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.13

Temuulen Khishigsuren, Gábor Bella, T. Brochhagen, Daariimaa Marav, Fausto Giunchiglia, Khuyagbaatar Batsuren

{"title":"转喻有多普遍?来自大规模多语言分析的结果","authors":"Temuulen Khishigsuren, Gábor Bella, T. Brochhagen, Daariimaa Marav, Fausto Giunchiglia, Khuyagbaatar Batsuren","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metonymy is regarded by most linguists as a universal cognitive phenomenon, especially since the emergence of the theory of conceptual mappings. However, the field data backing up claims of universality has not been large enough so far to provide conclusive evidence. We introduce a large-scale analysis of metonymy based on a lexical corpus of over 20 thousand metonymy instances from 189 languages and 69 genera. No prior study, to our knowledge, is based on linguistic coverage as broad as ours. Drawing on corpus analysis, evidence of universality is found at three levels: systematic metonymy in general, particular metonymy patterns, and specific metonymy concepts.","PeriodicalId":255232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP","volume":"404 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Universal is Metonymy? Results from a Large-Scale Multilingual Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Temuulen Khishigsuren, Gábor Bella, T. Brochhagen, Daariimaa Marav, Fausto Giunchiglia, Khuyagbaatar Batsuren\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Metonymy is regarded by most linguists as a universal cognitive phenomenon, especially since the emergence of the theory of conceptual mappings. However, the field data backing up claims of universality has not been large enough so far to provide conclusive evidence. We introduce a large-scale analysis of metonymy based on a lexical corpus of over 20 thousand metonymy instances from 189 languages and 69 genera. No prior study, to our knowledge, is based on linguistic coverage as broad as ours. Drawing on corpus analysis, evidence of universality is found at three levels: systematic metonymy in general, particular metonymy patterns, and specific metonymy concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP\",\"volume\":\"404 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

转喻被大多数语言学家认为是一种普遍的认知现象，尤其是在概念映射理论出现之后。然而，迄今为止，支持普遍性主张的实地数据还不够多，无法提供结论性证据。本文基于189种语言69个属的2万多个转喻实例的词汇语料库，对转喻进行了大规模的分析。据我们所知，此前没有任何研究像我们的研究那样，基于如此广泛的语言覆盖。通过对语料库的分析，我们可以在三个层面上发现转喻的普遍性:一般的系统转喻、特定的转喻模式和特定的转喻概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How Universal is Metonymy? Results from a Large-Scale Multilingual Analysis

Metonymy is regarded by most linguists as a universal cognitive phenomenon, especially since the emergence of the theory of conceptual mappings. However, the field data backing up claims of universality has not been large enough so far to provide conclusive evidence. We introduce a large-scale analysis of metonymy based on a lexical corpus of over 20 thousand metonymy instances from 189 languages and 69 genera. No prior study, to our knowledge, is based on linguistic coverage as broad as ours. Drawing on corpus analysis, evidence of universality is found at three levels: systematic metonymy in general, particular metonymy patterns, and specific metonymy concepts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP

自引率

0.00%

发文量