基于市场和信息的环境政策的政治经济学

Jason M. Walter
{"title":"基于市场和信息的环境政策的政治经济学","authors":"Jason M. Walter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3892503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary research shows consumers are willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly products, suggesting eco-labels and other information-based policies may be an alternative to market-based policy tools. Emission taxes and tradable permits incentivize pollution reduction through monetary penalties, thereby punishing dirtier firms. Eco-labeling, instead, incentivizes pollution reduction through monetary rewards, allowing producers to leverage environmentally-concerned consumers’ willingness-to-pay to increase their profits. A comparison of emission taxes and eco-labels illustrates a “carrot” versus “stick” approach to environmental policy. Both approaches yield environmental benefits; however, the political nature of environmental policy can create scenarios where the socially-optimal environmental policy is not implemented. This paper compares the political and economic impacts from traditional market-based policies to the popularized use of information-based eco-labels. The political nature of environmental policy suggests the “stick” provides an unpopular but effective environmental guidance, whereas the “carrot” shifts cost to consumers and yields only minor environmental benefits.","PeriodicalId":388441,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Economy of Market-Based and Information-Based Environmental Policies\",\"authors\":\"Jason M. Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3892503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary research shows consumers are willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly products, suggesting eco-labels and other information-based policies may be an alternative to market-based policy tools. Emission taxes and tradable permits incentivize pollution reduction through monetary penalties, thereby punishing dirtier firms. Eco-labeling, instead, incentivizes pollution reduction through monetary rewards, allowing producers to leverage environmentally-concerned consumers’ willingness-to-pay to increase their profits. A comparison of emission taxes and eco-labels illustrates a “carrot” versus “stick” approach to environmental policy. Both approaches yield environmental benefits; however, the political nature of environmental policy can create scenarios where the socially-optimal environmental policy is not implemented. This paper compares the political and economic impacts from traditional market-based policies to the popularized use of information-based eco-labels. The political nature of environmental policy suggests the “stick” provides an unpopular but effective environmental guidance, whereas the “carrot” shifts cost to consumers and yields only minor environmental benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

当代研究表明,消费者愿意为环保产品支付额外费用,这表明生态标签和其他基于信息的政策可能是市场政策工具的替代方案。排放税和可交易许可证通过货币惩罚激励污染减少,从而惩罚污染企业。相反,生态标签通过金钱奖励来激励污染减少,允许生产者利用关心环境的消费者的支付意愿来增加他们的利润。排放税和生态标签的比较说明了环境政策的“胡萝卜”和“大棒”方法。这两种方法都能产生环境效益;然而,环境政策的政治性质可能会造成社会最优环境政策无法实施的情况。本文比较了传统市场化政策与信息化生态标签推广使用的政治经济影响。环境政策的政治性质表明,“大棒”提供了一种不受欢迎但有效的环境指导,而“胡萝卜”将成本转移给消费者,只产生很小的环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Political Economy of Market-Based and Information-Based Environmental Policies
Contemporary research shows consumers are willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly products, suggesting eco-labels and other information-based policies may be an alternative to market-based policy tools. Emission taxes and tradable permits incentivize pollution reduction through monetary penalties, thereby punishing dirtier firms. Eco-labeling, instead, incentivizes pollution reduction through monetary rewards, allowing producers to leverage environmentally-concerned consumers’ willingness-to-pay to increase their profits. A comparison of emission taxes and eco-labels illustrates a “carrot” versus “stick” approach to environmental policy. Both approaches yield environmental benefits; however, the political nature of environmental policy can create scenarios where the socially-optimal environmental policy is not implemented. This paper compares the political and economic impacts from traditional market-based policies to the popularized use of information-based eco-labels. The political nature of environmental policy suggests the “stick” provides an unpopular but effective environmental guidance, whereas the “carrot” shifts cost to consumers and yields only minor environmental benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信