{"title":"MPI- corbench:迈向MPI正确性基准测试套件","authors":"Jan-Patrick Lehr, Tim Jammer, C. Bischof","doi":"10.1145/3431379.3460652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is the de-facto standard for distributed memory computing in high-performance computing (HPC). To aid developers write correct MPI programs, different tools have been proposed, e.g., Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector (ITAC), MUST, Parcoach and MPI-Checker. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of these tools is hard to compare, as they have not been evaluated on a common set of applications. More importantly, well-known and widespread benchmarks, which tend to be well-tested and error free, were used for their evaluation. To enable a structured comparison and improve the coverage and reliability of available MPI correctness tools, we propose MPI-CorrBench as a common test harness. MPI-CorrBench enables a structured comparison of the different tools available w.r.t. various types of errors. In our evaluation, we use MPI-CorrBench to provide a well-defined set of error-cases to MUST, ITAC, Parcoach and MPI-Checker. In particular, we find that ITAC and MUST complement each other in many cases. In general, MUST works better for detecting type errors while ITAC is better in detecting errors in non-blocking operations. Although the most-used functions of MPI are well supported, MPI-CorrBench shows that for one sided communication, the error detection capability of all evaluated tools needs improvement. Moreover, our experiments reveal a MPI standard violation in the MPICH test suite as well as several cases of discouraged use of MPI functionality.","PeriodicalId":343991,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MPI-CorrBench: Towards an MPI Correctness Benchmark Suite\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Patrick Lehr, Tim Jammer, C. Bischof\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3431379.3460652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is the de-facto standard for distributed memory computing in high-performance computing (HPC). To aid developers write correct MPI programs, different tools have been proposed, e.g., Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector (ITAC), MUST, Parcoach and MPI-Checker. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of these tools is hard to compare, as they have not been evaluated on a common set of applications. More importantly, well-known and widespread benchmarks, which tend to be well-tested and error free, were used for their evaluation. To enable a structured comparison and improve the coverage and reliability of available MPI correctness tools, we propose MPI-CorrBench as a common test harness. MPI-CorrBench enables a structured comparison of the different tools available w.r.t. various types of errors. In our evaluation, we use MPI-CorrBench to provide a well-defined set of error-cases to MUST, ITAC, Parcoach and MPI-Checker. In particular, we find that ITAC and MUST complement each other in many cases. In general, MUST works better for detecting type errors while ITAC is better in detecting errors in non-blocking operations. Although the most-used functions of MPI are well supported, MPI-CorrBench shows that for one sided communication, the error detection capability of all evaluated tools needs improvement. Moreover, our experiments reveal a MPI standard violation in the MPICH test suite as well as several cases of discouraged use of MPI functionality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3431379.3460652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3431379.3460652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
MPI-CorrBench: Towards an MPI Correctness Benchmark Suite
The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is the de-facto standard for distributed memory computing in high-performance computing (HPC). To aid developers write correct MPI programs, different tools have been proposed, e.g., Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector (ITAC), MUST, Parcoach and MPI-Checker. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of these tools is hard to compare, as they have not been evaluated on a common set of applications. More importantly, well-known and widespread benchmarks, which tend to be well-tested and error free, were used for their evaluation. To enable a structured comparison and improve the coverage and reliability of available MPI correctness tools, we propose MPI-CorrBench as a common test harness. MPI-CorrBench enables a structured comparison of the different tools available w.r.t. various types of errors. In our evaluation, we use MPI-CorrBench to provide a well-defined set of error-cases to MUST, ITAC, Parcoach and MPI-Checker. In particular, we find that ITAC and MUST complement each other in many cases. In general, MUST works better for detecting type errors while ITAC is better in detecting errors in non-blocking operations. Although the most-used functions of MPI are well supported, MPI-CorrBench shows that for one sided communication, the error detection capability of all evaluated tools needs improvement. Moreover, our experiments reveal a MPI standard violation in the MPICH test suite as well as several cases of discouraged use of MPI functionality.