用手势学习第二语言韵律:个体差异在乐感中的作用

L. V. Maastricht, M. Hoetjes, Lisette van der Heijden
{"title":"用手势学习第二语言韵律:个体差异在乐感中的作用","authors":"L. V. Maastricht, M. Hoetjes, Lisette van der Heijden","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to disentangle the influence of gesture type, physical involvement level, and individual differences in learner characteristics, i.e., working memory (WM) capacity and musicality, in determining the effectiveness of L2 lexical stress training. To this end, 60 native speakers of Dutch read aloud Spanish phrases containing cognates, which were counterbalanced for lexical stress position compared to their Dutch counterpart (e.g., ‘piRÁmides’ in Spanish, ‘piraMIdes’ in Dutch). They did so as a pre-test before receiving lexical stress training (T1) and as a post-test both directly after training (T2), and approximately one hour later (T3). Subjects received lexical stress training in one of five conditions varying in gesture type and physical involvement level: audio-visual (AV), AV-beat-perception, AV-beat-production, AV-metaphoric-perception, AV-metaphoric-production. Between T2 and T3, subjects performed a WM capacity and musical aptitude task. The results show that irrespective of training condition subjects significantly improved their L2 lexical stress production from T1 to T2 and T3. Although differences between training conditions were non-significant, there were several significant three-way interactions between WM capacity or musical aptitude and testing time and training condition. This underlines the importance of considering task and learner characteristics in determining the gestural benefit in learning L2 prosody.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning L2 Prosody using Gestures: The Role of Individual Differences related to Musicality\",\"authors\":\"L. V. Maastricht, M. Hoetjes, Lisette van der Heijden\",\"doi\":\"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aimed to disentangle the influence of gesture type, physical involvement level, and individual differences in learner characteristics, i.e., working memory (WM) capacity and musicality, in determining the effectiveness of L2 lexical stress training. To this end, 60 native speakers of Dutch read aloud Spanish phrases containing cognates, which were counterbalanced for lexical stress position compared to their Dutch counterpart (e.g., ‘piRÁmides’ in Spanish, ‘piraMIdes’ in Dutch). They did so as a pre-test before receiving lexical stress training (T1) and as a post-test both directly after training (T2), and approximately one hour later (T3). Subjects received lexical stress training in one of five conditions varying in gesture type and physical involvement level: audio-visual (AV), AV-beat-perception, AV-beat-production, AV-metaphoric-perception, AV-metaphoric-production. Between T2 and T3, subjects performed a WM capacity and musical aptitude task. The results show that irrespective of training condition subjects significantly improved their L2 lexical stress production from T1 to T2 and T3. Although differences between training conditions were non-significant, there were several significant three-way interactions between WM capacity or musical aptitude and testing time and training condition. This underlines the importance of considering task and learner characteristics in determining the gestural benefit in learning L2 prosody.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Speech Prosody 2022\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Speech Prosody 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨手势类型、肢体参与程度以及学习者工作记忆能力和乐感等特征的个体差异对二语词汇压力训练效果的影响。为此,60名以荷兰语为母语的人大声朗读含有同源词的西班牙语短语,这些短语在词汇重音位置上与荷兰语相平衡(例如,西班牙语中的“piRÁmides”,荷兰语中的“piraMIdes”)。他们在接受词汇压力训练(T1)之前进行了前测试,在训练后直接(T2)和大约一小时后(T3)进行了后测试。受试者在手势类型和身体参与程度不同的五种条件下接受词汇压力训练:视听、AV-节拍感知、AV-节拍产生、AV-隐喻感知、AV-隐喻产生。在T2和T3之间,受试者进行了脑记忆能力和音乐能力的测试。结果表明,无论何种训练条件下,被试在T1到T2和T3阶段均显著提高了二语词汇应力的产生。虽然训练条件之间的差异不显著,但WM能力或音乐能力与测试时间和训练条件之间存在显著的三方交互作用。这强调了在确定学习第二语言韵律的手势益处时考虑任务和学习者特征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning L2 Prosody using Gestures: The Role of Individual Differences related to Musicality
The present study aimed to disentangle the influence of gesture type, physical involvement level, and individual differences in learner characteristics, i.e., working memory (WM) capacity and musicality, in determining the effectiveness of L2 lexical stress training. To this end, 60 native speakers of Dutch read aloud Spanish phrases containing cognates, which were counterbalanced for lexical stress position compared to their Dutch counterpart (e.g., ‘piRÁmides’ in Spanish, ‘piraMIdes’ in Dutch). They did so as a pre-test before receiving lexical stress training (T1) and as a post-test both directly after training (T2), and approximately one hour later (T3). Subjects received lexical stress training in one of five conditions varying in gesture type and physical involvement level: audio-visual (AV), AV-beat-perception, AV-beat-production, AV-metaphoric-perception, AV-metaphoric-production. Between T2 and T3, subjects performed a WM capacity and musical aptitude task. The results show that irrespective of training condition subjects significantly improved their L2 lexical stress production from T1 to T2 and T3. Although differences between training conditions were non-significant, there were several significant three-way interactions between WM capacity or musical aptitude and testing time and training condition. This underlines the importance of considering task and learner characteristics in determining the gestural benefit in learning L2 prosody.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信