基于挑战的实验室教学提高了物理电子电路实验室的互动性

L. Watai, A. Brodersen, S. Brophy
{"title":"基于挑战的实验室教学提高了物理电子电路实验室的互动性","authors":"L. Watai, A. Brodersen, S. Brophy","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2005.1612240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering labs provide an environment for both conceptual inquiry and procedural/practical skill and knowledge acquisition. Student performance in both areas can vary depending on their prior competencies and knowledge of basic concepts of the lab, motivation, and expectations. And when insufficient resources are available for students to learn how to perform routine lab procedures, students and lab instructors often spend the entire lab period addressing procedural issues and not enough time spent on conceptual inquiry and discussion. A study at Vanderbilt University explored the potential of providing \"just in time, in context\" Web-based learning resources during before-lab and during-lab access to determine if student procedural queries that predominantly occupy TA time can be reduced and increase conceptual discussions. This paper describes the study and presents statistics on conceptual and procedural deficiencies in individual students and the class, results showing positive outcomes in student self-correction of misconceptions using Web-based resources, and improvement in the quality of student and TA interaction in the lab","PeriodicalId":281157,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenge-based Lab Instruction Improves Interaction in Physical Electronic Circuits Labs\",\"authors\":\"L. Watai, A. Brodersen, S. Brophy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2005.1612240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Engineering labs provide an environment for both conceptual inquiry and procedural/practical skill and knowledge acquisition. Student performance in both areas can vary depending on their prior competencies and knowledge of basic concepts of the lab, motivation, and expectations. And when insufficient resources are available for students to learn how to perform routine lab procedures, students and lab instructors often spend the entire lab period addressing procedural issues and not enough time spent on conceptual inquiry and discussion. A study at Vanderbilt University explored the potential of providing \\\"just in time, in context\\\" Web-based learning resources during before-lab and during-lab access to determine if student procedural queries that predominantly occupy TA time can be reduced and increase conceptual discussions. This paper describes the study and presents statistics on conceptual and procedural deficiencies in individual students and the class, results showing positive outcomes in student self-correction of misconceptions using Web-based resources, and improvement in the quality of student and TA interaction in the lab\",\"PeriodicalId\":281157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

工程实验室为概念探究和程序/实践技能和知识获取提供了一个环境。学生在这两个领域的表现可能会因他们之前的能力和对实验室基本概念的了解、动机和期望而有所不同。当学生没有足够的资源来学习如何执行常规的实验程序时,学生和实验教师经常把整个实验时间都花在处理程序问题上,而没有足够的时间用于概念探究和讨论。范德比尔特大学(Vanderbilt University)的一项研究探索了在实验前和实验期间提供“及时、情境”的网络学习资源的潜力,以确定是否可以减少学生的程序性提问,这些提问主要占据了助教的时间,并增加概念讨论。本文描述了这项研究,并提供了关于个别学生和班级的概念和程序缺陷的统计数据,结果显示了学生使用网络资源自我纠正错误观念的积极成果,以及学生和助教在实验室中互动质量的提高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenge-based Lab Instruction Improves Interaction in Physical Electronic Circuits Labs
Engineering labs provide an environment for both conceptual inquiry and procedural/practical skill and knowledge acquisition. Student performance in both areas can vary depending on their prior competencies and knowledge of basic concepts of the lab, motivation, and expectations. And when insufficient resources are available for students to learn how to perform routine lab procedures, students and lab instructors often spend the entire lab period addressing procedural issues and not enough time spent on conceptual inquiry and discussion. A study at Vanderbilt University explored the potential of providing "just in time, in context" Web-based learning resources during before-lab and during-lab access to determine if student procedural queries that predominantly occupy TA time can be reduced and increase conceptual discussions. This paper describes the study and presents statistics on conceptual and procedural deficiencies in individual students and the class, results showing positive outcomes in student self-correction of misconceptions using Web-based resources, and improvement in the quality of student and TA interaction in the lab
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信