同行评议的力量:通往专业的途径。

Patricia H Goble, D. Langford, S. Vincent, K. Powers
{"title":"同行评议的力量:通往专业的途径。","authors":"Patricia H Goble, D. Langford, S. Vincent, K. Powers","doi":"10.1097/01.NUMA.0000511927.05764.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is one strategy used to create the constructive work environments needed for positive patient care outcomes. The American Nurses Association (ANA) first defined peer review in 1988—a definition that remains relevant today. Peer reviews should be performed on a continuous basis, practice-focused, timely, based on the reviewed nurse’s experience level, and implemented by nurses of the same rank.1 More recently, the ANA reaffirmed the need for peer review of all practicing nurses to promote reflection and practice improvement.2 The American Nurses Credentialing Center also recognizes the necessity of peer review and mandates its completion for healthcare facilities to meet the exemplary professional practice component of Magnet® recognition.3 However, despite recommendations to improve nursing practice and care quality through peer review implementation, many nurse managers only utilize peer review annually and often don’t follow the ANA guidelines.4 We conducted a pilot study of an innovative peer review committee to determine if peer reviews positively influence nurses’ professionalism. (See Figure 1.)","PeriodicalId":358194,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Management (springhouse)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power of peer review: A pathway to professionalism.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia H Goble, D. Langford, S. Vincent, K. Powers\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NUMA.0000511927.05764.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peer review is one strategy used to create the constructive work environments needed for positive patient care outcomes. The American Nurses Association (ANA) first defined peer review in 1988—a definition that remains relevant today. Peer reviews should be performed on a continuous basis, practice-focused, timely, based on the reviewed nurse’s experience level, and implemented by nurses of the same rank.1 More recently, the ANA reaffirmed the need for peer review of all practicing nurses to promote reflection and practice improvement.2 The American Nurses Credentialing Center also recognizes the necessity of peer review and mandates its completion for healthcare facilities to meet the exemplary professional practice component of Magnet® recognition.3 However, despite recommendations to improve nursing practice and care quality through peer review implementation, many nurse managers only utilize peer review annually and often don’t follow the ANA guidelines.4 We conducted a pilot study of an innovative peer review committee to determine if peer reviews positively influence nurses’ professionalism. (See Figure 1.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":358194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Management (springhouse)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Management (springhouse)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000511927.05764.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Management (springhouse)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000511927.05764.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同行评议是一种策略,用于创造积极的病人护理结果所需的建设性工作环境。美国护士协会(ANA)在1988年首次定义了同行评议——这个定义今天仍然适用。同行评议应在持续的基础上,以实践为中心,及时进行,以被评议护士的经验水平为基础,并由同级护士实施最近,ANA重申需要对所有执业护士进行同行评议,以促进反思和实践改进美国护士资格认证中心也认识到同行评审的必要性,并要求医疗机构完成同行评审,以满足Magnet®认证的模范专业实践组成部分然而,尽管建议通过实施同行评议来改善护理实践和护理质量,但许多护士管理者只利用每年一次的同行评议,往往不遵循ANA指南我们对一个创新的同行评议委员会进行了一项试点研究,以确定同行评议是否对护士的专业精神产生积极影响。(参见图1。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The power of peer review: A pathway to professionalism.
Peer review is one strategy used to create the constructive work environments needed for positive patient care outcomes. The American Nurses Association (ANA) first defined peer review in 1988—a definition that remains relevant today. Peer reviews should be performed on a continuous basis, practice-focused, timely, based on the reviewed nurse’s experience level, and implemented by nurses of the same rank.1 More recently, the ANA reaffirmed the need for peer review of all practicing nurses to promote reflection and practice improvement.2 The American Nurses Credentialing Center also recognizes the necessity of peer review and mandates its completion for healthcare facilities to meet the exemplary professional practice component of Magnet® recognition.3 However, despite recommendations to improve nursing practice and care quality through peer review implementation, many nurse managers only utilize peer review annually and often don’t follow the ANA guidelines.4 We conducted a pilot study of an innovative peer review committee to determine if peer reviews positively influence nurses’ professionalism. (See Figure 1.)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信