贸易图像

Mathias Risse, G. Wollner
{"title":"贸易图像","authors":"Mathias Risse, G. Wollner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198837411.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces the images-terminology used throughout the book and addresses Amoral Trade, Instrumental Trade, and Structural Equity, three competitors to the image the book adopts. Amoral Trade is the view that trade is an interaction among a myriad of individuals that does not let trade come up for (much) moral assessment in the first place. Instrumental Trade does give moral significance to trade, but only to the extent that trade helps with the pursuit of other goals. According to Structural Equity, each state may remove from the totality of trade gains what it could generate in autarky and the remaining surplus is divided equally among participating states. The chapter rejects these images and then introduces its own image, Trade-As-One-Ground, and offers some initial arguments for it.","PeriodicalId":184406,"journal":{"name":"On Trade Justice","volume":"75 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Images of Trade\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Risse, G. Wollner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198837411.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter introduces the images-terminology used throughout the book and addresses Amoral Trade, Instrumental Trade, and Structural Equity, three competitors to the image the book adopts. Amoral Trade is the view that trade is an interaction among a myriad of individuals that does not let trade come up for (much) moral assessment in the first place. Instrumental Trade does give moral significance to trade, but only to the extent that trade helps with the pursuit of other goals. According to Structural Equity, each state may remove from the totality of trade gains what it could generate in autarky and the remaining surplus is divided equally among participating states. The chapter rejects these images and then introduces its own image, Trade-As-One-Ground, and offers some initial arguments for it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On Trade Justice\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On Trade Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837411.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On Trade Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837411.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章介绍了全书中使用的图像术语,并讨论了非道德贸易、工具贸易和结构公平,这是本书采用的图像的三个竞争者。非道德贸易的观点是,贸易是无数个人之间的相互作用,首先不让贸易成为(太多)道德评估的对象。工具贸易确实赋予了贸易道德意义,但仅限于贸易有助于实现其他目标的程度。根据结构公平原则,每个国家都可以从贸易收益总额中扣除其在闭关自守时可能产生的收益,剩余的盈余在参与国之间平均分配。本章拒绝了这些形象,然后介绍了自己的形象,贸易作为一个地方,并提供了一些初步的论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Images of Trade
This chapter introduces the images-terminology used throughout the book and addresses Amoral Trade, Instrumental Trade, and Structural Equity, three competitors to the image the book adopts. Amoral Trade is the view that trade is an interaction among a myriad of individuals that does not let trade come up for (much) moral assessment in the first place. Instrumental Trade does give moral significance to trade, but only to the extent that trade helps with the pursuit of other goals. According to Structural Equity, each state may remove from the totality of trade gains what it could generate in autarky and the remaining surplus is divided equally among participating states. The chapter rejects these images and then introduces its own image, Trade-As-One-Ground, and offers some initial arguments for it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信