{"title":"第二语言泛读听力和精读听力的有效性比较","authors":"Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin","doi":"10.56498/3112021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fall semester of 2019, 237 Japanese university students were placed into three groups, 97 in an extensive listening group, 104 in an intensive listening group, and 42 in a control group. Participants were given a 100-question TOEIC listening test to assess L2 listening proficiency and then placed into their respective groups. During the 14-week semester, students completed six listening assignments adhering to either principle of extensive or intensive listening (as well as a control group that received no L2 listening homework). At the end of the semester, students were given another 100-question TOEIC listening test. Results indicated that the mean difference between the pre and post-test scores was significantly larger for the EL group than the IL group t(193) = 2.14, p <.05. Among the suggestions for future research are a codification of EL and IL methodologies, a linkage of testing instruments to account for variability in testing conditions, and greater scrutiny of the participants' adherence to the intervention.","PeriodicalId":332189,"journal":{"name":"English as a Foreign Language International Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effectiveness of L2 Extensive and Intensive Listening Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin\",\"doi\":\"10.56498/3112021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the fall semester of 2019, 237 Japanese university students were placed into three groups, 97 in an extensive listening group, 104 in an intensive listening group, and 42 in a control group. Participants were given a 100-question TOEIC listening test to assess L2 listening proficiency and then placed into their respective groups. During the 14-week semester, students completed six listening assignments adhering to either principle of extensive or intensive listening (as well as a control group that received no L2 listening homework). At the end of the semester, students were given another 100-question TOEIC listening test. Results indicated that the mean difference between the pre and post-test scores was significantly larger for the EL group than the IL group t(193) = 2.14, p <.05. Among the suggestions for future research are a codification of EL and IL methodologies, a linkage of testing instruments to account for variability in testing conditions, and greater scrutiny of the participants' adherence to the intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English as a Foreign Language International Journal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English as a Foreign Language International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56498/3112021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English as a Foreign Language International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56498/3112021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在2019年秋季学期,237名日本大学生被分为三组,97人在广泛听力组,104人在强化听力组,42人在对照组。参与者先做了100道托业听力测试,以评估第二语言的听力水平,然后被分到各自的小组。在为期14周的学期中,学生们完成了六项听力作业,这些作业遵循了广泛或强化听力的原则(以及没有收到第二语言听力作业的对照组)。学期结束时,学生们又进行了一次100道托业听力测试。结果显示,EL组测试前和测试后得分的平均差异显著大于IL组t(193) = 2.14, p < 0.05。在对未来研究的建议中,包括对EL和IL方法的编纂,测试工具的联系,以解释测试条件的可变性,以及对参与者对干预的坚持进行更严格的审查。
Comparing the Effectiveness of L2 Extensive and Intensive Listening Approaches
In the fall semester of 2019, 237 Japanese university students were placed into three groups, 97 in an extensive listening group, 104 in an intensive listening group, and 42 in a control group. Participants were given a 100-question TOEIC listening test to assess L2 listening proficiency and then placed into their respective groups. During the 14-week semester, students completed six listening assignments adhering to either principle of extensive or intensive listening (as well as a control group that received no L2 listening homework). At the end of the semester, students were given another 100-question TOEIC listening test. Results indicated that the mean difference between the pre and post-test scores was significantly larger for the EL group than the IL group t(193) = 2.14, p <.05. Among the suggestions for future research are a codification of EL and IL methodologies, a linkage of testing instruments to account for variability in testing conditions, and greater scrutiny of the participants' adherence to the intervention.