政府政策的社会经济影响分析(PPKM 4级COVID-19回应案例研究2021)

Asep Rully Ferdiansyah
{"title":"政府政策的社会经济影响分析(PPKM 4级COVID-19回应案例研究2021)","authors":"Asep Rully Ferdiansyah","doi":"10.56910/jispendiora.v1i2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic COVID-19 is the health disaster that becomes the threat for many countries including Indonesia. Since the first positive case of COVID-19 found in March 2020 in Indonesia, the government has made policies starting from the Great Social Restriction (GSR), then changed into the Enforcement of Emergency Community Activity Restriction (ECAR), and finally became the Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4. Pandemic COVID-19 sparked the most devastating crisis experienced by multi-sectors with prolonged problems and uncertainty. Since the beginning of the implementation of the Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4, there have been many polemics caused by the lack of policy socialization to all society levels, implementation transparency and social grants accountability. This study uses the consructivist paradigm in the form of qualitative descriptive with the formal evaluation approach. This Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4 is the only “Top Down” or centralized policy base, and less decentralized the decentralization and concurrent. The three stakeholders (government, public and private sector) need to improve the collaboration to achieve the synergy. The government needs to take actions to be more interactive, negotiable, open to dialogue and facilitating all stakeholders in order to help people in this difficult situation for getting the full support from all stakeholders. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":371619,"journal":{"name":"JISPENDIORA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS DAMPAK SOSIAL EKONOMI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH (STUDI KASUS PPKM LEVEL 4 COVID-19 JAWA-BALI 2021)\",\"authors\":\"Asep Rully Ferdiansyah\",\"doi\":\"10.56910/jispendiora.v1i2.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pandemic COVID-19 is the health disaster that becomes the threat for many countries including Indonesia. Since the first positive case of COVID-19 found in March 2020 in Indonesia, the government has made policies starting from the Great Social Restriction (GSR), then changed into the Enforcement of Emergency Community Activity Restriction (ECAR), and finally became the Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4. Pandemic COVID-19 sparked the most devastating crisis experienced by multi-sectors with prolonged problems and uncertainty. Since the beginning of the implementation of the Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4, there have been many polemics caused by the lack of policy socialization to all society levels, implementation transparency and social grants accountability. This study uses the consructivist paradigm in the form of qualitative descriptive with the formal evaluation approach. This Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4 is the only “Top Down” or centralized policy base, and less decentralized the decentralization and concurrent. The three stakeholders (government, public and private sector) need to improve the collaboration to achieve the synergy. The government needs to take actions to be more interactive, negotiable, open to dialogue and facilitating all stakeholders in order to help people in this difficult situation for getting the full support from all stakeholders. \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":371619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISPENDIORA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISPENDIORA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v1i2.78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISPENDIORA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v1i2.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行是对包括印度尼西亚在内的许多国家构成威胁的卫生灾难。自2020年3月印度尼西亚发现第一例新冠肺炎阳性病例以来,政府制定了从大社会限制(GSR)开始的政策,然后改为执行紧急社区活动限制(ECAR),最后成为执行社区活动限制(ECAR)四级。2019冠状病毒病大流行引发了多部门经历的最具破坏性的危机,带来了长期的问题和不确定性。社区活动限制执行(ECAR)四级自实施以来,由于政策缺乏社会化、执行透明度和社会补助问责制等问题,引发了诸多争议。本研究采用建构主义范式以定性描述的形式结合形式评价的方法。这种社区活动限制(ECAR)级别4的强制执行是唯一的“自顶向下”或集中式策略基础,并且分散化和并行化较少。三方(政府、公共和私营部门)需要加强合作,实现协同效应。政府需要采取更多互动、协商、开放对话的行动,并为所有利益相关者提供便利,以帮助处于困境中的人们获得所有利益相关者的全力支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS DAMPAK SOSIAL EKONOMI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH (STUDI KASUS PPKM LEVEL 4 COVID-19 JAWA-BALI 2021)
The pandemic COVID-19 is the health disaster that becomes the threat for many countries including Indonesia. Since the first positive case of COVID-19 found in March 2020 in Indonesia, the government has made policies starting from the Great Social Restriction (GSR), then changed into the Enforcement of Emergency Community Activity Restriction (ECAR), and finally became the Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4. Pandemic COVID-19 sparked the most devastating crisis experienced by multi-sectors with prolonged problems and uncertainty. Since the beginning of the implementation of the Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4, there have been many polemics caused by the lack of policy socialization to all society levels, implementation transparency and social grants accountability. This study uses the consructivist paradigm in the form of qualitative descriptive with the formal evaluation approach. This Enforcement of Community Acvitity Restriction (ECAR) Level 4 is the only “Top Down” or centralized policy base, and less decentralized the decentralization and concurrent. The three stakeholders (government, public and private sector) need to improve the collaboration to achieve the synergy. The government needs to take actions to be more interactive, negotiable, open to dialogue and facilitating all stakeholders in order to help people in this difficult situation for getting the full support from all stakeholders.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信