{"title":"《约翰福音》和《神道信教》中比喻语言中的神和人的代理","authors":"P. Richardson, Miori Nagashima","doi":"10.1075/cogls.20011.ric","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper seeks to extend the focus of previous analyses of agency and metaphor in Christianity and Buddhism\n (Charteris-Black 2017; Chilton 2004;\n Richardson 2012; Richardson & Nagashima\n 2018) by comparing the results of a previous cognitive linguistic analysis of John 14:6 (Kövecses 2011) with an analysis of figurative language and agency patterns in an extract from a Jodo\n Shinshu Buddhist text (Wilson 2009). The comparative analysis highlights both locally\n contingent and more stable differences in both texts. However, we also discuss some highly schematic conceptual similarities that\n deserve further study. These include some similarities in their use of journey and light source domains, the\n role of the divine agent in the salvation process, one aspect of the divine entity embodying and acting as instrument for another\n aspect of the same divine entity, and the divine act being a paragon for human action.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"362 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divine and human agency in figurative language from John’s Gospel and Jodo‑Shinshu Buddhism\",\"authors\":\"P. Richardson, Miori Nagashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/cogls.20011.ric\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper seeks to extend the focus of previous analyses of agency and metaphor in Christianity and Buddhism\\n (Charteris-Black 2017; Chilton 2004;\\n Richardson 2012; Richardson & Nagashima\\n 2018) by comparing the results of a previous cognitive linguistic analysis of John 14:6 (Kövecses 2011) with an analysis of figurative language and agency patterns in an extract from a Jodo\\n Shinshu Buddhist text (Wilson 2009). The comparative analysis highlights both locally\\n contingent and more stable differences in both texts. However, we also discuss some highly schematic conceptual similarities that\\n deserve further study. These include some similarities in their use of journey and light source domains, the\\n role of the divine agent in the salvation process, one aspect of the divine entity embodying and acting as instrument for another\\n aspect of the same divine entity, and the divine act being a paragon for human action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"volume\":\"362 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20011.ric\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20011.ric","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Divine and human agency in figurative language from John’s Gospel and Jodo‑Shinshu Buddhism
This paper seeks to extend the focus of previous analyses of agency and metaphor in Christianity and Buddhism
(Charteris-Black 2017; Chilton 2004;
Richardson 2012; Richardson & Nagashima
2018) by comparing the results of a previous cognitive linguistic analysis of John 14:6 (Kövecses 2011) with an analysis of figurative language and agency patterns in an extract from a Jodo
Shinshu Buddhist text (Wilson 2009). The comparative analysis highlights both locally
contingent and more stable differences in both texts. However, we also discuss some highly schematic conceptual similarities that
deserve further study. These include some similarities in their use of journey and light source domains, the
role of the divine agent in the salvation process, one aspect of the divine entity embodying and acting as instrument for another
aspect of the same divine entity, and the divine act being a paragon for human action.